Sony sensors are cheaper, efficient and practical and deliver great results.
There has been similar shift and change with medium format digital camera, big names like Phase One, Fuji and even Hassy employed Sony CMOS sensors.
There were huge benefits and technology caught up with old CCD sensors.
However, there was "something special with them" something in highlights and true 16 bit tonal range where CMOS delivered 14 bit and better shadows and low light.
CCD DB was never practical, poor low light and difficult to focus , buggy, no live previews, poor LCD screen...
However, there are many professional photographers and so much debate of image and tonal rendition of DALSA CCD sensors.
Others tried to match in post , etc.
Something to be said about new tech taking over old. (CCD chips were lot more expensive to make)
In both instances sensors were replaced in favour of Sony chips, due to cost and convenience.
IMX 461100MP Sony sensor, which Hasselblad utilizes and adapts for its flagships.
https://ymcinema.com/2021/08/12/hasselb ... mat-magic/CMOS have taken over, some photographers still swear by old CCD DB and not letting go.
I personally love the image from old CCD Dalsa chip, tonal range and ability to push 16bit image , highlight dr was insane and image just felt organic.
Image taken with Phase One P40+ ,Schneider Kreuznach 80mm f2.8 AF LS lens
[code]
Isabel by
darko5757, on Flickr/code]
At the end of the day, it comes down to your own preference as an artist.
Which brush you are choosing for your painting.