- Posts: 1
- Joined: Wed May 18, 2022 8:53 am
- Real Name: Stephen Berry
I assume that you have a Micro that shares the Super 16 sized sensor with the OG BMPCC. If you use a C mount to M4/3 adapter, there are affordable lenses made for 16mm film cameras that you can use. Some fully cover the S16 sensor without vignetting.
Here is a comparison of $140 USD and up Cooke lens to a Panasonic G X Vario 12-35mm f/2.8 Asph. lens on an original S16 BMPCC.
This is a 1958 Taylor Hobson Cooke Ivotal Anastigmat 1" (25mm) F/1.4 C mount at ISO 200 set to F/4 on the top and a Panasonic Lumix G X Vario 12-35mm Asph. lens set to 18mm at F/2.8 and ISO 400 on the bottom. Both are using Hoya IR cut and Tiffen Variable ND filters on a BMPCC. With the Cooke, I had greater range of color to work with in post, possibly due to fewer coatings on the lens. The Lumix image looked flat, with less depth from the foreground to background. The leaves look plasticy, and the stone Olmec head has a modelled look to it that seems fake.
Re: Does the glass make that much of a difference?
viewtopic.php?f=2&t=107746&p=596809&hilit=Cooke#p596809
An Angenieux-zoom f/2.2 - 17-68mm or a 9.5-57mm lens from around 13-17mm up would cover a S16 sensor.