FEATURE REQUEST for BMPCC 4K 6K 6Kpro URSA MINI

The place for questions about shooting with Blackmagic Cameras.
  • Author
  • Message
Offline

ryangordonflowers

  • Posts: 2
  • Joined: Sun Jun 19, 2022 8:45 pm
  • Real Name: Ryan Flowers

FEATURE REQUEST for BMPCC 4K 6K 6Kpro URSA MINI

PostSun Jun 19, 2022 8:59 pm

Hello I have a feature request:

Hoping for more functionality with the Anamorphic De-squeeze options.

I hope that any shooting resolution, we could have option to choose which anamorphic de-squeeze to monitor with (2X, 1.5X, 1.33X etc).

Also: Option to toggle 2X Anamorphic De-squeeze on or off in 4:3 mode (it is automatically turned on in that resolution and no option to turn it off).

1.5X Anamorphic De-squeeze Option.

Thanks for the phenomenal cameras Blackmagic!!!!
Offline
User avatar

rick.lang

  • Posts: 17262
  • Joined: Wed Aug 22, 2012 5:41 pm
  • Location: Victoria BC Canada

Re: FEATURE REQUEST for BMPCC 4K 6K 6Kpro URSA MINI

PostMon Jun 20, 2022 3:57 am

I agree with your suggestion that it would be better for the anamorphic settings to be user-selectable. We do have support for quite a lot of recording resolutions and aspect ratios, but not user control of desqueeze options. In most cases the defaults are likely suitable, but some people may still have their own good reasons for selecting a different desqueeze for a frame.

Nothing stops you from recording with a mismatched anamorphic lens and sorting it out in post, but your monitor image will take some adjustment to be comfortable shooting that way.
Rick Lang
Offline

Zweistein

  • Posts: 207
  • Joined: Tue Oct 15, 2019 5:19 pm
  • Location: Germany
  • Real Name: Jannik Tesch

Re: FEATURE REQUEST for BMPCC 4K 6K 6Kpro URSA MINI

PostWed Jun 22, 2022 4:54 am

+1

Especially the 4:3 no-desqueeze option.
I have already made a feature request for that, maybe you put a "+1" there, too.
My feature request –> viewtopic.php?f=2&t=155470
Cinematographerwww.janniktesch.comwww.sensorsizes.com
UMP 4.6K G1 6.9.4 – PCC4K OLPF 8.1 – Resolve Studio 18.6.5 – macOS 14.4 – MacBook Pro 2023, M2 Pro, 14"
EIZO CG247XUltraStudio Monitor 3G 12.5 – Micro Panel
Offline

thomas bruegger

  • Posts: 260
  • Joined: Thu Oct 18, 2012 5:43 pm
  • Location: switzerland

Re: FEATURE REQUEST for BMPCC 4K 6K 6Kpro URSA MINI

PostWed Jun 22, 2022 9:46 am

+1
Thomas Bruegger / garage5 GmbH
www.garage5.ch
Offline
User avatar

Olivier Burri

  • Posts: 135
  • Joined: Sun Apr 24, 2016 7:15 am
  • Location: Geneva, Switzerland

Re: FEATURE REQUEST for BMPCC 4K 6K 6Kpro URSA MINI

PostMon Jun 27, 2022 9:46 am

+1

Variable desqueezze would be great. like on SmallHD monitord.
Olivier G. Burri
Offline

Chris Cronin

  • Posts: 116
  • Joined: Tue Sep 22, 2015 8:45 pm

Re: FEATURE REQUEST for BMPCC 4K 6K 6Kpro URSA MINI

PostTue Jun 28, 2022 1:54 pm

+1
Offline

Ellory Yu

  • Posts: 4003
  • Joined: Wed Jul 30, 2014 5:25 pm

Re: FEATURE REQUEST for BMPCC 4K 6K 6Kpro URSA MINI

PostWed Jun 29, 2022 5:01 am

+1 here too.
URSA Mini Pro 4.6K G2, Blackmagic Design Pocket Cinema Camera 6K, Panasonic GH5
PC Workstation Core I7 64Gb, 2 x AMD R9 390X 8Gb, Blackmagic Design DeckLink 4K Mini Monitor, Windows 10 Pro 64-bit, Resolve Studio 18, BM Micro Panel & Speed Editor
Offline

geophrian

  • Posts: 3
  • Joined: Fri Sep 30, 2022 5:29 am
  • Real Name: Geoff Ryan

Re: FEATURE REQUEST for BMPCC 4K 6K 6Kpro URSA MINI

PostSun Oct 02, 2022 8:28 am

+1
Offline

pbpfeiff

  • Posts: 1
  • Joined: Fri Nov 25, 2022 6:24 pm
  • Real Name: Patrick Pfeiffer

Re: FEATURE REQUEST for BMPCC 4K 6K 6Kpro URSA MINI

PostFri Nov 25, 2022 6:25 pm

+1 PLEASE
Offline
User avatar

samlap

  • Posts: 30
  • Joined: Fri Sep 03, 2021 1:33 pm
  • Location: Switzerland, Zurich
  • Real Name: Samuel Laprand

Re: FEATURE REQUEST for BMPCC 4K 6K 6Kpro URSA MINI

PostMon May 08, 2023 7:42 am

+1
Online

ShaheedMalik

  • Posts: 759
  • Joined: Wed Aug 19, 2020 5:28 am
  • Real Name: Shaheed Malik

Re: FEATURE REQUEST for BMPCC 4K 6K 6Kpro URSA MINI

PostMon May 08, 2023 11:40 am

+1
Offline
User avatar

HykCIne

  • Posts: 203
  • Joined: Sun Aug 23, 2020 7:53 am
  • Real Name: Hayk Haykyan

Re: FEATURE REQUEST for BMPCC 4K 6K 6Kpro URSA MINI

PostMon May 08, 2023 11:53 am

+1
Z Cam E2-F6 Pro / Tokina 11-20 / Canon 17-55 / Sigma 18-35 / Sigma 50-100 /
Offline
User avatar

rick.lang

  • Posts: 17262
  • Joined: Wed Aug 22, 2012 5:41 pm
  • Location: Victoria BC Canada

Re: FEATURE REQUEST for BMPCC 4K 6K 6Kpro URSA MINI

PostMon May 08, 2023 8:03 pm

It’s certainly easier to judge your shot if the camera/monitor is showing the correct desqueeze that corresponds to the lens or adapter that’s squeezing the image. But the 1.8x squeeze is close to 2x desqueeze if the camera gives you that option. So I don’t think that’s much of a challenge. However if you have 1.8x squeezed images and the camera’s/monitor’s anamorphic desqueeze is Off, it is very difficult to judge the frame carefully. You could do it but it is risky that something you think is in frame may not be there in post after the desqueeze.

The horizontal X-axis is squeezed in the camera’s recorded frame, but I get to the proper aspect ratio in post by applying the complementary Edit / Transform / Zoom to the Y-axis only. That gives me complete control in deciding if a recorded circle looks like the real circle. It’s never what I’d call exact however.

So a 2x anamorphic squeeze of the X-axis in camera is corrected in post by a 0.5x Zoom of the Y-axis. A 1.33x squeeze in camera is corrected in post by a 0.75189x zoom of the Y-axis.

A 1.8x squeeze in camera corresponds to a 0.55556x zoom in post. Not exactly but close enough.

Perhaps someone knows the facts in the design of all anamorphic lenses, but I suspect the actual lens squeeze may be affected by the distance of the subjects to the camera with the exact squeeze only applying to subjects at infinity. I know SLR Magic is upfront about this for their Anamorphot that has a smaller squeeze for Near subjects versus Normal distanced subjects b
Rick Lang
Offline

Zweistein

  • Posts: 207
  • Joined: Tue Oct 15, 2019 5:19 pm
  • Location: Germany
  • Real Name: Jannik Tesch

Re: FEATURE REQUEST for BMPCC 4K 6K 6Kpro URSA MINI

PostMon May 08, 2023 9:31 pm

rick.lang wrote:But the 1.8x squeeze is close to 2x desqueeze if the camera gives you that option.


But even that difference is absolutly abysmal to work with, in my opinion.

If we were 10 or 20 years ago – yes I would understand that I'd have to live with that compromise. But with todays technology and so many 200$ china monitors having a completely user controllable de-squeeze option, I don't even want to talk about compromises like looking at a 1.8x squeezed image on a 2x de-squeezed monitor.

Kim Janson wrote:For monitoring yes, but is it then that important it is exactly right?

Absolutely, in my opinion.
Cinematographerwww.janniktesch.comwww.sensorsizes.com
UMP 4.6K G1 6.9.4 – PCC4K OLPF 8.1 – Resolve Studio 18.6.5 – macOS 14.4 – MacBook Pro 2023, M2 Pro, 14"
EIZO CG247XUltraStudio Monitor 3G 12.5 – Micro Panel
Offline
User avatar

samlap

  • Posts: 30
  • Joined: Fri Sep 03, 2021 1:33 pm
  • Location: Switzerland, Zurich
  • Real Name: Samuel Laprand

Re: FEATURE REQUEST for BMPCC 4K 6K 6Kpro URSA MINI

PostMon May 08, 2023 10:12 pm

Also, the problem is that Blackmagic does not allow us to use the 2x desqueeze unless the 3.7K anamorphic mode is toggled, but we definitely loose resolution, plus it’s windowed sensor.
I have made a comparison between shooting 6K with my 1.8x anamorphic 35mm lens, and 3.7K mode with 2x desqueeze on camera turned on (actually it is automatically turned on), and we can clearly see the loss of information within the image. All sides are cropped, especially left and right, so definitely not useable. It’s super sad because Blackmagic allows us to use the 1.33 anamorphic desqueeze on any recording modes, which works so well, even put the 1.33 tag for DaVinci Resolve to automatically desqueeze it. It would be so simple for them to add the usual desqueeze ratios that they provide within Resolve (1.25x / 1.3-1.33x / 1.5x / 1.8x / 2.0x) in all recording modes available in camera. Like that, we would at least be able to display status text (cinematographer or director) for external monitors, without having to use such monitors to desqueeze the whole image, and therefore make these texts impossible to read.
Please, Blackmagic, add that to your amazing cameras!
Attachments
IMG_6766.jpeg
1.8x anamorphic lens with 3.7K anamorphic recording mode on BMPCC 6k Pro
IMG_6766.jpeg (63.07 KiB) Viewed 2231 times
IMG_6765.jpeg
1.8x anamorphic lens with 1.8x pixel aspect ratio within Resolve
IMG_6765.jpeg (90.65 KiB) Viewed 2231 times
Offline

Thecreator82

  • Posts: 24
  • Joined: Sat Jun 25, 2022 1:44 pm
  • Real Name: Fausto Cantarella

Re: FEATURE REQUEST for BMPCC 4K 6K 6Kpro URSA MINI

PostTue May 09, 2023 1:00 pm

if for that while we're at it (since it would just be a HUD overlay) why not add a golden ratio grid? even my Mi note 10 has it ...
Attachments
102411_1951_Fotografare2.jpg
102411_1951_Fotografare2.jpg (8.34 KiB) Viewed 2136 times
102411_1951_Fotografare1.jpg
102411_1951_Fotografare1.jpg (8.05 KiB) Viewed 2136 times
Offline

Hunter

  • Posts: 1
  • Joined: Tue Jun 27, 2023 4:37 pm
  • Real Name: Raoul Heimrich

Re: FEATURE REQUEST for BMPCC 4K 6K 6Kpro URSA MINI

PostTue Jun 27, 2023 4:46 pm

Need it too! For a 1.8 Anamorphic lens.

Return to Cinematography

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: ShaheedMalik and 99 guests