Macksey wrote:Yes I know this for 4k on the Bmpc, I was on about shooting 1080p at higher frame rates and having the option of DNxHD, raw, In another video he was asked this question about BM cameras he laughed and he said yes you can record at 1080p up to 120 on ANY camera with HDMI or SDI and the specs also say that you can. Of cause I'm still yet to any footage from this recorder but judging by their other models they do, it should be worth at least a rental for some jobs. The question for me is, will this record 1080 at 120 from any of the BM cameras for real? He says in the video it ignores the signal and records direct? I suppose you could say the same about how they can record 4k in their recorders with standard 2.5 hard drives and BM can't? It's all in the software. And we know the 4k sensor is capable of shooting at higher frame rates by just looking at the Ursa specs.
All of the current BM cams won't give you more than 30fps max, no matter what settings or outputs you are planning to use, everything else would require a serious hardware mod... which this is clearly
not, so this guy is "just talking" (regarding the video you linked).
Also - why they offer CinemaDNG recording.. I have no clue.. or is there (yet) any camera out there which provides the
real RAW non-debayered sensor data via some (proprietary?) HDMI/SDI format?
Afaik nothing out there at all... only the Apertus guys are thinking or planning something like that...
So currently recording in this format if you already have a debayered and processed HDMI/SDI signal is quite a waste of space and unnecessarily cumbersome.
Edit: guess I was not up-to-date.. so the C500 outputs "real RAW" via 3G SDI to external recorders, so that makes at least one camera (plus the FS700?)... although it makes me suspicious that they call it "Canon RAW" - is it really non-debayered raw sensor data or just an uncompressed Canon log image?
Edit2: found this "Canon Raw is a 10-bit format with baked-in ISO and white balance. [..] So is Canon Raw actually Raw? It is, in the sense that the image is not de-bayered before you get it – this step is still done in post. You can think of using Canon Raw as being a bit like ordering a steak medium rare."
So currently the whole RAW recording part of the Shogun basically only makes sense with the C500 & FS700, correct?
I guess that's what Geoff meant