Tokina 11-16mm Mark 1 or Mark 2?
Posted: Tue Dec 18, 2012 8:23 pm
Hi everyone,
As far as I know, the only difference between the Mark 1 and Mark 2 versions of the Canon mount Tokina 11-16mm 2.8 lens is that the Mark 2 has supposedly better coating. I am wondering if it's worth the extra £100 and if it's even noticeable in real life usage. Has anyone used both versions and noticed a difference?
As far as I know, the only difference between the Mark 1 and Mark 2 versions of the Canon mount Tokina 11-16mm 2.8 lens is that the Mark 2 has supposedly better coating. I am wondering if it's worth the extra £100 and if it's even noticeable in real life usage. Has anyone used both versions and noticed a difference?