N.A.B. 2013

Posted:
Sun Mar 24, 2013 9:09 am
by Ben Wells
What can we expect out of N. A. B. regarding the cinema camera? Updates? A new model? Competitive response from another company? Any Ideas?
Re: N.A.B. 2013

Posted:
Sun Mar 24, 2013 10:10 am
by Bernhard
Hello,
already wrote this in another thread, but it also fits here...
Since BMCC is a paradigm shift, a so-called Disruptive Innovation
by seeing cameras as workflow tools,
I think the only real competition to the BMCC we'll see at NAB would be more cams from BMD
following this new definition which is not restricted to cinema cams.
BMD had defined a camera market for it's own and will make other markets obsolete over time.
For NAB 2013, I'd expect the further development of this philosophy by
improving camera capabilities in terms of workflow and usability.
Realistically:
BMCC-update by an electronic MFT mount and a major firmware release.
Wishful thinking:
an altered hull design with V-Mount battery, 12bit ProRes4444 or ProResRAW (?), HDMI out,
full sized XLRs.
More wishful thinking:
an ENG version for video journalists with ProResHQ at 1080p/50/59,94
based on the current BMCC technology.
Best regards,
Bernhard
Re: N.A.B. 2013

Posted:
Sun Mar 24, 2013 1:36 pm
by Cameron Mckinlay
This is very far fetched but so was the BMCC at first. Would BM enter the world of high speed Cinema cameras to compete with the Phantom flex etc? I already have my BMCC on order but if they released a high speed camera with 500+fps at 1080p or higher at a similar price point I would for sure buy that too!
Sent from my GT-I9300 using Tapatalk 2
Re: N.A.B. 2013

Posted:
Sun Mar 24, 2013 2:05 pm
by rick.lang
Ben Wells wrote:What can we expect out of N. A. B. regarding the cinema camera? Updates? A new model? Competitive response from another company? Any Ideas?
This topic is being discussed in this thread:
viewtopic.php?t=6252Rick Lang
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk HD
Re: N.A.B. 2013

Posted:
Sun Mar 24, 2013 4:52 pm
by Ben Wells
Thank you for all of the great responses and the link to the already established thread. Sorry for the repeat.
Ben Wells