Thu Apr 11, 2013 12:05 am
The iPad would be a perfect monitoring solution. Unfortunately It just simply will not work.
I find It kind of ridiculous some of these monitor manufactures charge so much for such low resolution displays.
800 x480 for like $500+ ? really? I get that it comes with all the bells and whistles professionals might need. Peaking, levels, SDI, etc..
I just don't understand why a company out there cannot just simply package a High-Res Retina display into a simple shell with a battery and a hmdi input. I just need a larger screen to view what I'm seeing in more detail...
You can buy an used /new iPad 3 for 400$, and for that you get way more than a monitor. You get something with a WiFi module, Bluetooth and ARM processor, 5 MP camera ( 1080p ), a small profile light body, on-board storage and a 2048x1536 10" display, a built in battery that lasts a good 10+ hours ( without wireless usage ), etc...Some of these a useless as a monitor..but its all included for only 400$!
find me a monitor that will beat that display of an iPad 3 for that price....
No one can argue that the display on the iPad 3 is lacking. Its not 100% accurate display but I believe most will agree its a pretty darn good display...( for my needs its perfect. )
Hope someone out there will hear the call for something like this. It has the potential, and its definitely possible.
Otherwise I have looked into the idea of buying a cheap used macbook air 11/13" and using the thunderbolt as a display interface. That way I don't feel so ripped off by the fact that I payed 500+$ for just a bulky, blocky monitor. ( the air's portability and built in battery is a huge plus, and it also has a quite bright and color rich display. Also.....its a computer....)
Then again peoples needs are different. What I mentioned above would be what I need.
Regards,
Schoolpost.