Jim Simon wrote:Probably more like 90%.
Sadly true.
John Paines wrote:Folks will be coming for simple solutions, not to be reproached for looking for them. Besides, it's a losing battle.
What if there are no simple solutions? Often people come on the forum with one of four problems (or some combination of them):
1) old/slow computer unable to handle a color, edit, or post session
2) large amount of material shot without timecode that won't conform or won't sync up easily
3) poorly-lit/badly shot material that they're desperately trying to salvage
4) people looking for solutions to color-time large, complex projects that would take hundreds of hours to explain, let alone solve their problems.
So sometimes,
there are no simple solutions. For me, a large amount of post production supervision and managing the color process took decades to figure out, and it required learning photography, understanding lighting, knowing the limitations of cameras. Sometimes, it boils down to managing client expectations: they want 1000%, but the reality is we may not ever be able to give them more than 100% because of 1, 2, 3, 4.
So the answer may lie in better work habits, better equipment, more knowledge and experience, along with trial and error. So a fast/simple solution may not exist.
I've often lamented, the problem for a lot of neophyte colorists is they believe if they know where all the menus, buttons, and knobs are, and what they do, they can do the work. But often it's the
why of which knob and technique is used that's important... and that part ain't in the manual.