Fri May 30, 2025 6:43 am
Best practice would be to keep it how you have it, as you probably have some native UHD assets (text, graphics etc.) and shots that are not zoomed in as much which will benefit somewhat.
To be honest in my experience the difference between a native UHD signal and an upscaled HD signal on a UHD TV is very minor at normal viewing distances - all other things being equal. Compression type matters a lot more in my opinion.
But if the speed/file size benefits of HD are not really a factor, your probably better off outputting in UHD.
Something like UHD Prores(HQ) is a great codec to use for youtube.
You could also try resolves superscale to see if that gets you a better looking result than the standard algorithm when scaling up some clips.
Also, to your option 2), no it is not quite the same, things are still processed at UHD and then downscaled to HD for the output, I wouldn't recommend it for mastering over 3) or 1). Generally the less stacked scaling operations to shots the better (ideally just 1 or none).
Freelance colourist.