- Posts: 320
- Joined: Thu Dec 17, 2020 10:45 am
- Real Name: Florian Erfurth
Hi, I'm aware that not many of you have Cloud Store Mini yet, but still I would like to know your opinions.
Currently I'm working with Davinci Studio project with footage stored on my QNAP so no video data is stored on my editing machines, so it accesses directly via videos on QNAP.
Its a QNAP TVS-h1688x with four Samsung EVO 870 1TB configured as RAID5 and boosted with two 970 EVO Pro as SSD-Cache and many HDDs for archives and office stuff. The Volume for video footage (for active projects) is stored on the pool with 4x SSDs (RAID5). I have a 10GBit network here.
Until now it work fine, but I have to admit that until now I only had h.264 videos as footage. I didn't test with braw footage stored on QNAP yet.
I have two workplaces (Office and HomeOffice) and my QNAP is based at my HomeOffice. Now I'm thinking about getting a second storage for the office so I can work at home or at the office. So I'm thinking: Shall I buy another QNAP, or should I prefer BMD Cloud Store Mini. If it was out there when I bought my QNAP, I'd have prefered the Cloud Store Mini.
So now my question: Would I expect a performance rise with BMD Cloud Store Mini over QNAP? Davinci accesses the data on QNAP via Samba (so its file based) and I think there are some overheads which could reduce the performance. I don't think anyone of us will know, which protocol Cloud Store Mini is using. Samba? Proprietary Protocol, maybe a block-based instead of a file-based one? Since I think for video editing the block based access is faster than file based one.
Sure the benefit of Cloud Store is syncing over Dropbox (I'd prefer Owncloud since I own one) so I could buy two Cloud Store Minis place them at both workplaces and keep them both synced.
Your thoughts?
Best regards
Floh
Currently I'm working with Davinci Studio project with footage stored on my QNAP so no video data is stored on my editing machines, so it accesses directly via videos on QNAP.
Its a QNAP TVS-h1688x with four Samsung EVO 870 1TB configured as RAID5 and boosted with two 970 EVO Pro as SSD-Cache and many HDDs for archives and office stuff. The Volume for video footage (for active projects) is stored on the pool with 4x SSDs (RAID5). I have a 10GBit network here.
Until now it work fine, but I have to admit that until now I only had h.264 videos as footage. I didn't test with braw footage stored on QNAP yet.
I have two workplaces (Office and HomeOffice) and my QNAP is based at my HomeOffice. Now I'm thinking about getting a second storage for the office so I can work at home or at the office. So I'm thinking: Shall I buy another QNAP, or should I prefer BMD Cloud Store Mini. If it was out there when I bought my QNAP, I'd have prefered the Cloud Store Mini.
So now my question: Would I expect a performance rise with BMD Cloud Store Mini over QNAP? Davinci accesses the data on QNAP via Samba (so its file based) and I think there are some overheads which could reduce the performance. I don't think anyone of us will know, which protocol Cloud Store Mini is using. Samba? Proprietary Protocol, maybe a block-based instead of a file-based one? Since I think for video editing the block based access is faster than file based one.
Sure the benefit of Cloud Store is syncing over Dropbox (I'd prefer Owncloud since I own one) so I could buy two Cloud Store Minis place them at both workplaces and keep them both synced.
Your thoughts?
Best regards
Floh
Last edited by floh79 on Mon May 09, 2022 7:28 pm, edited 1 time in total.