- Posts: 4011
- Joined: Wed Jul 30, 2014 5:25 pm
Let me caution everyone that this is not or even near a scientific test. It is more of a personal experience trying out the limits of DR Studio 18 on a barebones Apple MacBook M2. The system had the base 8/8 core cpu/gpu, 8gb of RAM, and 256gb storage. When I tried this computer out, I set some basic parameters like my timelines where 2K DCI scope and that I would try out one short film that was 4K DCI scope and a 2K SCI scope feature length. The short film was 11 minutes in runtime and the feature (which can be watch on Amazon Prime) is almost 160 minutes long. Both where 23.976fps and shot in Prores 422 using the URSA Mini Pro 4.6K G2 and Sony A7iii (with Atomos Ninja). My workflow is ACES cct 1.3.
These are old archived projects so all I had to do is import them into DRS. I had to use the Studio version because the project had some effects and NR, and other features only available on the Studio version.
I am amazed that both imported with minimum hitch, like having to delink a few files and adding custom LUTS that were made for the films respectively. The only thing I set on DRS was to set the render cache to ‘Smart’ and use the lightest codecs for creating the optimized media so it can be a little faster nd small file sizes.
I kid you not that both played back on the timeline at 23.976 smoothly, scrubbing the clips on the timeline was so smooth. The only thing I notice is at the beginning of the run inside DRS, there is a slight struggle to get to 23.768fps (always green) from beginning to end. I can’t believe what I was seeing. With the feature, once in a while I get it to stagger (red) but when I get back to it again, it was it’s playing smoothly. During processing, NR tend to stress the system out but very slightly.
This is not a replacement for any workstations and I am not suggesting that this is the right computer for a serious editor and colorist, but I can say if you’re working mostly on HD/FHD and 2K projects with some temporal work, and have render caching on, it’s a nifty option. I’m impressed. I am just sharing my experiences trying out the Mac M2, especially coming from a PC user and environment for which I do my professional editing and grading.
Rending out the timeline as 2K DCI scope in H.265 took 13.10 minutes for the 11 minute short film and interestingly the feature film only took 19.20 minutes to render as 2K DCI scope in H.265. I am still doing a lot of indie features that are 80 to 160 minutes in runtime length but they are mostly for 2K DCI 23.976 or 24fps and my experiment with the M2 seem to tell me that it’s a good budget laptop that can support a no so demanding workflow.
I also run the BMD Speed Test tool on the same MacBook M2 and this is the result I have been getting:
These are old archived projects so all I had to do is import them into DRS. I had to use the Studio version because the project had some effects and NR, and other features only available on the Studio version.
I am amazed that both imported with minimum hitch, like having to delink a few files and adding custom LUTS that were made for the films respectively. The only thing I set on DRS was to set the render cache to ‘Smart’ and use the lightest codecs for creating the optimized media so it can be a little faster nd small file sizes.
I kid you not that both played back on the timeline at 23.976 smoothly, scrubbing the clips on the timeline was so smooth. The only thing I notice is at the beginning of the run inside DRS, there is a slight struggle to get to 23.768fps (always green) from beginning to end. I can’t believe what I was seeing. With the feature, once in a while I get it to stagger (red) but when I get back to it again, it was it’s playing smoothly. During processing, NR tend to stress the system out but very slightly.
This is not a replacement for any workstations and I am not suggesting that this is the right computer for a serious editor and colorist, but I can say if you’re working mostly on HD/FHD and 2K projects with some temporal work, and have render caching on, it’s a nifty option. I’m impressed. I am just sharing my experiences trying out the Mac M2, especially coming from a PC user and environment for which I do my professional editing and grading.
Rending out the timeline as 2K DCI scope in H.265 took 13.10 minutes for the 11 minute short film and interestingly the feature film only took 19.20 minutes to render as 2K DCI scope in H.265. I am still doing a lot of indie features that are 80 to 160 minutes in runtime length but they are mostly for 2K DCI 23.976 or 24fps and my experiment with the M2 seem to tell me that it’s a good budget laptop that can support a no so demanding workflow.
I also run the BMD Speed Test tool on the same MacBook M2 and this is the result I have been getting:
- Screen Shot 1.jpg (109.63 KiB) Viewed 2910 times
URSA Mini Pro 4.6K G2, Blackmagic Design Pocket Cinema Camera 6K, Panasonic GH5
PC Workstation Core I7 64Gb, 2 x AMD R9 390X 8Gb, Blackmagic Design DeckLink 4K Mini Monitor, Windows 10 Pro 64-bit, Resolve Studio 18, BM Micro Panel & Speed Editor
PC Workstation Core I7 64Gb, 2 x AMD R9 390X 8Gb, Blackmagic Design DeckLink 4K Mini Monitor, Windows 10 Pro 64-bit, Resolve Studio 18, BM Micro Panel & Speed Editor