Blank
Blank
https://forum.blackmagicdesign.com/
https://forum.blackmagicdesign.com/viewtopic.php?f=21&t=129578
alb3530 wrote:I would try to set the bitrate manually (according the source footage) instead of automatic (it's set to "automatic" in the right image you posted).
Also, take a look at advanced render settings, as there are options here related to color.
If all fails:
Can you export and share a test project (and footage) where this problem happens?
I can try to render it here and find the problem.
John Paines wrote:https://forum.blackmagicdesign.com/viewtopic.php?f=36&t=129525
awppollock wrote:Is there a particular solution on that page you are recommending? I do not have an option for encoder for some reason. Any elaboration would be deeply helpful. Thanks.
Philipp Glaninger wrote:There seems to be a shift of brightness in your end result (gamma shift). This is such a complicated topic that I can not help you in that regard. But give this massive post a look. viewtopic.php?f=21&t=101253&hilit=gamma+shift
Back to your Question about Quality:
I observed that the quality of an H264 Export can vary between different Programs and in my opinion the H264 Export in Resolve is only of medium quality even in the Studio Version where you will have some more options to tweak the H264 Export.
Instead of using Resolve to create a High End H264 file I would advise you to export a high Quality Codec like DNxHR HQX 10bitor ProRes 422HQ (or better) instead and then doing the transcode into H264 or (better) H265 in some other Software like Handbrake which is free on Mac and PC. It is not simple to use but very good when you understand what you are doing.
Once I was asked to create a 10min long H.264 with HD resolution that should only use 30mb of space. No chance to make that look good with the Resolve export. But in Handbrake I was able to get a very good result for H.264 and a fantastic result in H.265 (with the cost of very long render Times. I think it was something like 3hours).
But if you really want to enhance the render quality within Resolve then you definitely should activate Multi-pass encode. And you can try the software renderer by deactivating Use hardware acceleration if available. It will be somewhat slower, but you may have different options that may enhance quality.
But like I said. Dedicated transcoders like Handbrake may give you better results.
alb3530 wrote:I don't know how to check the bitrate on Mac. In Windows 10, it's in file Properties.
You can set the bitrate in Resolve here:
But after two more experienced users had posted their views about it, bitrate settings won't probably help.
If you can share some test footage, I can at least test if the problem also happens on Windows, but it might be of no use for you because you use Mac.
John Paines wrote:awppollock wrote:Is there a particular solution on that page you are recommending? I do not have an option for encoder for some reason. Any elaboration would be deeply helpful. Thanks.
Output to a so-called "intermediate codec" in Resolve, rather than h.264/5 formats. On Windows intermediate codecs would include DNxHR and Cineform, or Prores on Mac. Then take that large file into a conversion utility like Handbrake or Shutter Encoder and compress it to h.264/5. You'll need to experiment with data rates to find out what's best for you.
Philipp Glaninger wrote:There seems to be a shift of brightness in your end result (gamma shift). This is such a complicated topic that I can not help you in that regard. But give this massive post a look. viewtopic.php?f=21&t=101253&hilit=gamma+shift
Back to your Question about Quality:
I observed that the quality of an H264 Export can vary between different Programs and in my opinion the H264 Export in Resolve is only of medium quality even in the Studio Version where you will have some more options to tweak the H264 Export.
Instead of using Resolve to create a High End H264 file I would advise you to export a high Quality Codec like DNxHR HQX 10bitor ProRes 422HQ (or better) instead and then doing the transcode into H264 or (better) H265 in some other Software like Handbrake which is free on Mac and PC. It is not simple to use but very good when you understand what you are doing.
Once I was asked to create a 10min long H.264 with HD resolution that should only use 30mb of space. No chance to make that look good with the Resolve export. But in Handbrake I was able to get a very good result for H.264 and a fantastic result in H.265 (with the cost of very long render Times. I think it was something like 3hours).
But if you really want to enhance the render quality within Resolve then you definitely should activate Multi-pass encode. And you can try the software renderer by deactivating Use hardware acceleration if available. It will be somewhat slower, but you may have different options that may enhance quality.
But like I said. Dedicated transcoders like Handbrake may give you better results.
awppollock wrote:
What is the best way to share footage?
awppollock wrote: I am using mac, so you know which Prores would be best for that? Also, do you have any solutions for the darkening of the image? Do you think it could be related to project settings with regard to color settings? Thanks again.
Uli Plank wrote:awppollock wrote: I am using mac, so you know which Prores would be best for that? Also, do you have any solutions for the darkening of the image? Do you think it could be related to project settings with regard to color settings? Thanks again.
ProRes 422 HQ is plenty good enough.
The darkening is a side effect of not using professional monitoring.
Experiment with Rec 709-A and do a lot of reading, it's a complex issue.