You know what? Something really came to my mind reading this thread, just now:
Why would these specific rules need to apply specifically to Smooth Cut??
Yes I know, obviously, it's still regarded as a transition effect, which absolutely always need heads and tails to work. The before and after need to exist because they blend into each other.
BUT the "only" use of Smooth Cut is to smooth out differences between jump cuts. Perhaps even in direct contrast of the idea of a normal transition, in Smooth Cut I specifically choose the last usable frame and the first usable new frame, because what's in between I deem unusable!
The very concept of Smooth Cut implies that I don't want anything in-between the cut, and rather it should look like one continuous take!
I know you could use it for artistic purposes and all that, but to place it between eg. a long shot and a close up, and complain it looks horrible, is asinine. The only usable instance for smooth cut is, in my mind, for hiding Jump Cuts, as best as you can, especially now that is utilizes Speedwarp.
So, for this specific use, why would it matter what came before and what comes next? I give you the last frame, I give you the next "first frame", figure out a way to morph between those two smoothly and do your best!
Especially if exactly in-between is a movement I don't want, and would throw the whole transition out the window!
Just a silly train of thought I had right now

Intel i7 13700K @3,4 Ghz-- Geforce RTX 3090 24GB -- 64GB DDR5 RAM -- 512GB OS nvMe -- 512GB nvMe scratch -- 1TB nvMe footage -- Windows 10 LTSC edition