FredStork wrote:No, don’t worry, it is normal that you get requested to enter the code from time to time. Maybe 2 times per year but I don't really keep track. What triggers this is not clear, can be just a random thing, at least I have not seen a system in it… And no, this does not consume your licences. You can have 2 concurrent instances and if you activate a third the first activated will be deactivated etc.
I know, I can have two activations, and how the system works, that's not the problem. It's the general flakiness.
It’s absolutely unacceptable for a paid product, like the Studio version. None of my other program activations behave like this. They may require, that you at least connect to the Internet once a month, but that’s it. Most do not even require that. That Studio just - willy nilly - decides, that it is not activated, is plain unacceptable for a professional product. It's a code quality problem, if anything!
IF you’re in a studio in a weekend, without access to the safe (or the guy with that access) to lay your hand on a legal license code, what do you do, when you have a deadline monday morning? Should all workplaces have the license code glued to the monitor, just in case it may be needed (as a DaVinci only requirement)? The codes will soon meander to the “discrete distribution channels” of the net.
If you are at a customer, starting DaVinci to display your latest masterpiece, or traveling - reporter, journalist, whatever - I guess you’ll have to involuntarily spread the license code to everybody looking, when it is glued to the notebook chassis, so that it cannot disappear into some hideout, you don’t remember after a week or two (or that just happened to be in the other shoulder bag, you left at home).
This will not do. Unacceptable. Completely amateurish!It’s just like the much touted portability, that really isn’t…
Try importing a project with - just as an example - VST plugins from an Intel based Mac. A project, that uses the wonderfully flexible Røde SoundField plugin, that you need to open on an M1 based computer, that has the plugin installed, and working on the same machine, when using Reaper (native M1 version):
- Reaper use of Røde Plugin
- Skærmbillede 2022-01-26 kl. 10.07.32.jpg (571.09 KiB) Viewed 1722 times
What happens in DaVinci Resolve 17.4.3 build 10, when the imported project needs to use that plugin?
During startup, this is what the log says:
- Code: Select all
2022-01-25 23:38:33.238 VstScanner[7266:201845] Error loading /Library/Audio/Plug-Ins/VST/SoundField By RODE.vst/Contents/MacOS/SoundField By RODE: dlopen(/Library/Audio/Plug-Ins/VST/SoundField By RODE.vst/Contents/MacOS/SoundField By RODE, 0x0106): tried: '/Library/Audio/Plug-Ins/VST/SoundField By RODE.vst/Contents/MacOS/SoundField By RODE' (mach-o file, but is an incompatible architecture (have 'x86_64', need 'arm64e')), '/usr/lib/SoundField By RODE' (no such file)
2022-01-25 23:38:33.238 VstScanner[7266:201845] Error loading /Library/Audio/Plug-Ins/VST/SoundField By RODE.vst/Contents/MacOS/SoundField By RODE: dlopen(/Library/Audio/Plug-Ins/VST/SoundField By RODE.vst/Contents/MacOS/SoundField By RODE, 0x0106): tried: '/Library/Audio/Plug-Ins/VST/SoundField By RODE.vst/Contents/MacOS/SoundField By RODE' (mach-o file, but is an incompatible architecture (have 'x86_64', need 'arm64e')), '/usr/lib/SoundField By RODE' (no such file)
Only two of the 150 plus similar log entries in DaVinci, for a lot of plugins, that Reaper uses as usual without any complaints on the same machine. These two entries show the "SoundField By RODE" plugin, that reaper uses without hiccups (see previous image).
Now, the Røde plugin is available for selection in the group “Surround”, so you are forgiven, if you attempt to insert it on a track in Fairlight, you get this:
- Attempting to select the offered Røde Plugin
- Skærmbillede 2022-01-26 kl. 10.32.49.png (100.94 KiB) Viewed 1722 times
Same result, if you try to open the “Røde” plugin already present in a track in an imported project.
In fact it is quite surprising, how many log entries contain the term “Failde to find” and similar wordings. Is there anything not failing in the current version of DaVinci?
Here’s an indication (for inspiration? or rejection? long overdue in Studio
on how Reaper seemingly solves the problem:
- A possible inspiration to solve the plugin debacle on M1?
- Skærmbillede 2022-01-26 kl. 10.08.36.jpg (474.85 KiB) Viewed 1722 times
Note, that Reaper is also a native Apple Silicon application. Note that little “reaper_host”? This particular approach may not be suited for DaVinci Resolve Studio, but maybe, just maybe, a more flexible approach, than the current, was worth some effort on the DaVinci side of things.
What if, just what if, Blackmagic started (1) cleaning up their code (2) starting work on plugin compatibility (3) allocated resources to heighten stability and consistency of their Studio version - on all supported platforms?
Just a “what-if”?
Regards and a whicked smile.