I solved the problem by using FCPX/Compressor instead of DaVinchi Resolve Studio on the same machine (so it is probably not related to Ventura), where that was a feasable solution. In other cases I deduced, that the target audience wouldn’t notice anyhow, only I would know.
It is NOT a transcoding problem per se in DaVinchi Resolve. It is simply very hard to near impossible to force Studio to do a final render/delivery of the edit to high bitrate format (as described earlier).
It may be an Apple Silicon (M1 Pro pr M2 and up) and DaVinchi Resolve Studio interoperability problem, primarily, in the original posters case, but the Studio “resistance” to deliver final renders of edits into high h265 bitrates as described also existed before Ventura on M1 (lesser amount of internal codec support) - also 16GB/1TB.
I will not rule out, that the latest Apple Pro Codecs Update combined with Ventura 13.4 has had some influence.
In some projects, I had experimentally selected and used ProRES 4444 instead of ProRES 422 as Renderig codec setting in FCPX for especially high quality ProRES RAW work and grading. Just a test to see what happened. Only way to know for certain.
There was a visible difference while grading mixed material, especially when involving elements delivered as h264 and h265 10-bit 422 material, which differed visible in quality to ProRES 422 material during editing, when the Render codec in FCPX was set to ProRES 422 instead of ProRES 4444. This may have a perfectly good technical explanation; I chose the practical approach: learning by doing
In one specifically designed test project, I had the same sequence as internal h264 10-bit 422 HLG 25fps recording and simultaneous HDMI output to external ProRES 422 Atomos version. Identical content in two delivery formats. Too tempting for me.
The two versions were overlayed, and the crop on the top laver was gradually moved from left position zero to right to position 3840 and back to zero again. In one case (4444) it was impossible to see the moving crop “line” during HDR work on the MacBook Pro 14 M1 Pro (that screen is a beast). Depending on scene content (my ”video torture corner”) it was possible to clearly spot the moving “border line” between the two original formats (422).
I have the luxury to be able to “play” - ehhh - evaluate to my hearts content, when I decide to. Not everyone has that option.
Using 4444 instead of 422 on these projects has become very “choppy” during playback in edit lately, compared to earlier on same machine, projects etc (in FCPX).
Something did happen with the latest Apple updates, and Ventura certainly is and has been a royal PITA, but less so for my (!!) combination FCPX/Compressor use.
The specific “Rendering into final h265 HDR” high bitrate problem has not changed noticably in Studio. I always put it down to slight differences, development choices and “personality differences” between the two systems. They also exist on the ProRES RAW front; it’s in a way a case of knowing which poison to pick for specific projects
Regards