- Posts: 475
- Joined: Wed Feb 19, 2020 7:45 am
- Location: San Francisco Bay Area
- Real Name: Leonardo Levy
I'm still getting my feet wet re grading for clients and encountered a few problems in the round trip from Premiere to Resolve and back .
I just finished 2 jobs: One was a 30 min doc and the other just a 5 min industrial , but both were cut in premiere then sent to me for grading after which I returned the footage to the Editor to finish in Premiere.
Basically the grading went very well , but I encountered a few different problems with Premiere during this and I intend to get back soon with the editors to figure out what the issues were. Obviously I can't ask you guys to troubleshoot the Premiere setups that I haven't even looked at yet , but I'm wondering if anyone might have some ideas that could point me in the right directions when I do .
So here are the issues .
1 - Final Output from Premiere is flatter than my grade:
I like to grade in a timeline set to 709-A so that the images on my Mac look close to what I'm getting on my Flanders monitor. I find this comforting. The Flanders is being fed by the Davinci UltraStudio Mini Monitor so it is getting the correct 709 Gamma 2.4. Because many of my projects are just going to the web (youtube/Vimeo) I'm also in the habit of outputting to 709-A and sending that directly to the Web and that looks as I expect it it.
Since they were only going to the web I sent 709-A to my clients who then put it back in Premiere and added titles etc before outputting their shows. I don't know what their setups were in Premiere, but when I looked at the 30min doc on Youtube it looked terrible. It wasn't so much flat as the video levels were low as if you were watching through an ND filter.
Its not a final version yet so its not a big deal yet , but I want to figure out what's going on and suspect the editor won't know too much as he didn't complain to me immediately.
- Any iders about what could cause this? What settings in premiere I should look at?
-Is the problem that I sent him 709-A . Should I have sent him a version in standard 709 gamma 2.4 so Premiere would treat it as any camera original and let him worry about how to output for the web?
I might have a similar issues with the short industrial . Though I haven't seen it yet the editor told me that his export looked flatter than what I sent him .
Is Premiere perhaps setup already to export a lower gamma for the web so that we're basically flattening twice?
2 - The other issue is odder. The short industrial was shot properly in UHD 10bit slog3 on an A7siii by me and cut by the director who is experienced but not very technical. Before grading I requested an HD export of the finished edit in ProRes 422HQ including dissolves and fades but without titles just as I had with the 30 min doc. I used scene detect on the doc and it worked great. I also got an XML and a drive with copies of all the originals in case I needed it .
Well a few minutes into the edit I noticed that some of my images were breaking up badly on skies and large areas with solid colors and fall off. Then I noticed that the histogram peaks were very odd and jagged. I went back to the originals and the histograms looked much better and grading did not produce any breakup . Apparently the export from Premiere had been compressed. However the editor swore up and down that he had not compressed anything and simply exported his timeline as a ProRes 1920x1080 file. (He also sent me a UHD version which looked just as bad, but i think that came from the HD timeline.)
- Any ideas about what might have been wrong in the Premiere set-up that editor could have missed?
Ultimately I graded copies of the original UHD files with the XML and it worked out fine, but we will work together again and I want to figure what went wrong in the handoff.
I just finished 2 jobs: One was a 30 min doc and the other just a 5 min industrial , but both were cut in premiere then sent to me for grading after which I returned the footage to the Editor to finish in Premiere.
Basically the grading went very well , but I encountered a few different problems with Premiere during this and I intend to get back soon with the editors to figure out what the issues were. Obviously I can't ask you guys to troubleshoot the Premiere setups that I haven't even looked at yet , but I'm wondering if anyone might have some ideas that could point me in the right directions when I do .
So here are the issues .
1 - Final Output from Premiere is flatter than my grade:
I like to grade in a timeline set to 709-A so that the images on my Mac look close to what I'm getting on my Flanders monitor. I find this comforting. The Flanders is being fed by the Davinci UltraStudio Mini Monitor so it is getting the correct 709 Gamma 2.4. Because many of my projects are just going to the web (youtube/Vimeo) I'm also in the habit of outputting to 709-A and sending that directly to the Web and that looks as I expect it it.
Since they were only going to the web I sent 709-A to my clients who then put it back in Premiere and added titles etc before outputting their shows. I don't know what their setups were in Premiere, but when I looked at the 30min doc on Youtube it looked terrible. It wasn't so much flat as the video levels were low as if you were watching through an ND filter.
Its not a final version yet so its not a big deal yet , but I want to figure out what's going on and suspect the editor won't know too much as he didn't complain to me immediately.
- Any iders about what could cause this? What settings in premiere I should look at?
-Is the problem that I sent him 709-A . Should I have sent him a version in standard 709 gamma 2.4 so Premiere would treat it as any camera original and let him worry about how to output for the web?
I might have a similar issues with the short industrial . Though I haven't seen it yet the editor told me that his export looked flatter than what I sent him .
Is Premiere perhaps setup already to export a lower gamma for the web so that we're basically flattening twice?
2 - The other issue is odder. The short industrial was shot properly in UHD 10bit slog3 on an A7siii by me and cut by the director who is experienced but not very technical. Before grading I requested an HD export of the finished edit in ProRes 422HQ including dissolves and fades but without titles just as I had with the 30 min doc. I used scene detect on the doc and it worked great. I also got an XML and a drive with copies of all the originals in case I needed it .
Well a few minutes into the edit I noticed that some of my images were breaking up badly on skies and large areas with solid colors and fall off. Then I noticed that the histogram peaks were very odd and jagged. I went back to the originals and the histograms looked much better and grading did not produce any breakup . Apparently the export from Premiere had been compressed. However the editor swore up and down that he had not compressed anything and simply exported his timeline as a ProRes 1920x1080 file. (He also sent me a UHD version which looked just as bad, but i think that came from the HD timeline.)
- Any ideas about what might have been wrong in the Premiere set-up that editor could have missed?
Ultimately I graded copies of the original UHD files with the XML and it worked out fine, but we will work together again and I want to figure what went wrong in the handoff.
2017 27" 5K Retina iMac, 4,2Ghz i7, 64G Memory, Radeon Pro 580 8GB,
secondary screen is 27" Apple Thunderbolt Display, 1T internal SSD
secondary screen is 27" Apple Thunderbolt Display, 1T internal SSD