alexoreman wrote:The CentOS resolve image has always worked great for us on modern industry standard hardware in high end production scenarios.
i don't think its always useful, to stress this need of "modern industry standard hardware [as it should be seen as common] in high end production scenarios". sure -- if you really need a maximum of processing power, you will simply utilize this kind of hardware, but simple general compatibility should be seen as more a more or less independent demand.
really well [performance] optimized software, usually doesn't only work formidable on the most actual and expensive hardware, but often uses computing resources in such an efficient manner, that also quite moderate hardware profits a lot from this streamlining. otherwise they are usually not able, to handle really demanding bleeding edge tasks (e.g. 8K realtime HDR processing) even on much better hardware. sure -- not all optimizations are concerning both cases. there are also aspects, where you really have to choose different and incompatible solutions for high end processing, but in many cases, both sides will profit from suchlike software optimizations...
but that's just a more general marginal note.
concerning the actual question in this thread resp. parallel similar threads, we should better try to isolate the real issue. but in case of this particular laptop, it looks really hard, to find an answer, how the necessary minima of OpenCL or CUDA computing capabilities should be provided to resolve in a sufficient manner?