Page 1 of 1

DPX v2.0 vs DPX 1.0

PostPosted: Tue Jun 19, 2018 2:44 pm
by Julien Gignoux
Hello,

I have customers that asked us to create specifically DPX v2.0 files (that conforms to SMPTE Standard 268M-2003). However, Resolve 14 (and Resolve 15 Beta) seems to create only DPX v1.0 files.
I understand that it changes the header with additionnal data and a better structure of the header.

When you import DPX 2.0 files into Resolve, they are imported ok.
But is there a way to create this kind of filess in the deliver tab?
If not, is it something in the roadmap?

Thanks for your help.

Regards.

Julien GIGNOUX
Vectracom

Re: DPX v2.0 vs DPX 1.0

PostPosted: Wed Jun 20, 2018 1:48 am
by Peter Chamberlain
Can u ask your customer what application needs the dpx in that format?
Give dpx is used daily in thousands of renders it’s an interesting request

Re: DPX v2.0 vs DPX 1.0

PostPosted: Wed Jun 20, 2018 9:50 am
by Julien Gignoux
I don't think it's for a specific software.
The files are dedicated to be archived.

So for preservation consideration, our customer wants to go with the latest recommandations from the standard organizations (SMPTE).

Re: DPX v2.0 vs DPX 1.0

PostPosted: Thu Jun 21, 2018 9:48 am
by Peter Chamberlain
Ah, well we dont render in that format as its not used in the industry. Well hardly used.
Also, if they truly want to archive, it usually in EXR.

Re: DPX v2.0 vs DPX 1.0

PostPosted: Thu Jun 21, 2018 10:26 am
by Uli Plank
These days it would be a good idea to use ACES standards for archives.

Re: DPX v2.0 vs DPX 1.0

PostPosted: Thu Jun 21, 2018 11:26 am
by Marc Wielage
Uli Plank wrote:These days it would be a good idea to use ACES standards for archives.

Which ACES? There are several to choose from. (You see the problem.)

Re: DPX v2.0 vs DPX 1.0

PostPosted: Thu Jun 21, 2018 11:55 am
by Hendrik Proosa
Marc Wielage wrote:Which ACES? There are several to choose from. (You see the problem.)

Used ACES version should be written to metadata. This way whichever was used, it is possible to arrive to common ground and work from there.

Re: DPX v2.0 vs DPX 1.0

PostPosted: Thu Jun 21, 2018 3:29 pm
by MikeRochefort
Marc Wielage wrote:
Uli Plank wrote:These days it would be a good idea to use ACES standards for archives.

Which ACES? There are several to choose from. (You see the problem.)


It’s actually pretty straightforward. ACES2065-1 is the format for archival purposes and data handoffs.

Cheers,
Mike