DaVinci Resolve 17 | Feature Requests list

  • Author
  • Message
Offline

Mike Flynn

  • Posts: 255
  • Joined: Mon Mar 25, 2013 6:04 pm

Re: DaVinci Resolve 17 | Feature Requests list

PostSat May 18, 2019 12:15 pm

An audio indicator when an output is complete like AE does would be very nice.
Offline
User avatar

waltervolpatto

  • Posts: 7184
  • Joined: Thu Feb 07, 2013 5:07 pm
  • Location: 1146 North Las Palmas Ave. Hollywood, California 90038 USA

Re: DaVinci Resolve 17 | Feature Requests list

PostSat May 18, 2019 2:36 pm

output blanking: allow to define a blanking as x/y plus a [round to near pixel] option.

if I'm doing a DCP standard blanking, it HAS to be 2048x858 exactly: not 2.40, not 2.39, not 2.35. This has been wrong since 2005 (first long format DCP ever created, "serenity")

so, instead to let me express a fixed ratio or an arbitrary ratio number, let us use the pixels. if i have to define an arbitrary ratio (i.e. 2.20/1) I will use numbers like

2.20x1

and it still works.

Safe area...
1) have the safe area follow the blanking. Please....
2) define an arbitrary safe area using pixels 2048x858
3) define an arbitrary safe area using pixel and offset (to identify safe areas where the image is smaller that the whole display) case in point, I was doing review of a movie called CRAWL. the images for vfx are 2216x1364. on that I have to extract 2048x858 from the center., but I have to play the whole frame for the review. i have no practical way to create an outline to show where the actual frame line is
4) I never remember why in the edit page i cannot show the safe area in the main display...
5) I cannot in the gui to select 2.39... the only one that will have sense...
6) in the color page, if the safe area is on, i play something and i turn it off from the menu, it stay on until I move by a frame.
SuperServer 5039AD-I
C9X299-PGF - DDR4-2400 16x4 GB
i9-7920xCPU 12c 2.90GHz Water cooled
2x 1080ti DeckLink Studio 4K (11.4)
W10-1903 - BMR St. 16.1.1.005
nvidia: 431.86 studio
Offline
User avatar

Cary Knoop

  • Posts: 1182
  • Joined: Sun Mar 12, 2017 6:35 pm
  • Location: Newark, CA USA

Re: DaVinci Resolve 17 | Feature Requests list

PostSat May 18, 2019 3:46 pm

waltervolpatto wrote:if I'm doing a DCP standard blanking, it HAS to be 2048x858 exactl....

On that note, allow Cineform to process this resolution (I have been told it is NOT a Cineform limitation).

I would like to request allow defining multiple destinations (one, two or more) to be viewed in parallel routing to different Declink cards and output color spaces in the timeline node screen, like so:

multi-output-resolve.jpg
multi-output-resolve.jpg (75.12 KiB) Viewed 5943 times
Offline
User avatar

waltervolpatto

  • Posts: 7184
  • Joined: Thu Feb 07, 2013 5:07 pm
  • Location: 1146 North Las Palmas Ave. Hollywood, California 90038 USA

Re: DaVinci Resolve 17 | Feature Requests list

PostSat May 18, 2019 4:40 pm

Cary Knoop wrote:
waltervolpatto wrote:if I'm doing a DCP standard blanking, it HAS to be 2048x858 exactl....

On that note, allow Cineform to process this resolution (I have been told it is NOT a Cineform limitation).

I would like to request allow defining multiple destinations (one, two or more) to be viewed in parallel routing to different Declink cards and output color spaces in the timeline node screen, like so:

multi-output-resolve.jpg


I like the idea..!
SuperServer 5039AD-I
C9X299-PGF - DDR4-2400 16x4 GB
i9-7920xCPU 12c 2.90GHz Water cooled
2x 1080ti DeckLink Studio 4K (11.4)
W10-1903 - BMR St. 16.1.1.005
nvidia: 431.86 studio
Offline

Lee Niederkofler

  • Posts: 71
  • Joined: Wed Aug 29, 2012 12:42 pm

Re: DaVinci Resolve 17 | Feature Requests list

PostSat May 18, 2019 5:38 pm

waltervolpatto wrote:can we have more color for flags and markers?


+1
Offline

Lee Niederkofler

  • Posts: 71
  • Joined: Wed Aug 29, 2012 12:42 pm

Re: DaVinci Resolve 17 | Feature Requests list

PostSat May 18, 2019 5:39 pm

waltervolpatto wrote:in the motion flow analysis for noise reducer or for speed effect, there is the problem of analyzing tails (if existing).

case in point is a VFX show where each VFX is delivered with a slate of sort as first frame and the client want to use the shot form frame 2 (first frame of image). if you do a temporal noise reducer or a speedwarp, resolve will try to use the first frame that is garbage. same thing when you use an edl to cut a committed timeline.

so, a tool that can use tails to do something, should have a button/checkbox that allow use to only use visible frames (no tails).


Yes please!!
Offline

Jim Simon

  • Posts: 4456
  • Joined: Fri Dec 23, 2016 1:47 am

Re: DaVinci Resolve 17 | Feature Requests list

PostSun May 19, 2019 2:40 pm

waltervolpatto wrote:can we have more color for flags and markers?


I would find this useful for clips/tracks. I like to color my audio tracks according to audio type.

Green for Groom.
Orange for Officiant
Purple for Podium
Brown for Board
Navy for Nat

I've got nothing for Music. There's no M colors. How about Magenta, Mustard or Mauve.

How about Cyan, Crimson or Canary for Camera audio?

Maybe Fawn, Flame or Fuchsia for Foley clips?
Last edited by Jim Simon on Sun May 19, 2019 2:48 pm, edited 2 times in total.
Offline

Jim Simon

  • Posts: 4456
  • Joined: Fri Dec 23, 2016 1:47 am

Re: DaVinci Resolve 17 | Feature Requests list

PostSun May 19, 2019 2:44 pm

waltervolpatto wrote:output blanking: allow to define a blanking as x/y plus a [round to near pixel] option.


Wouldn't it be better to create a timeline with the required dimensions, instead of using blanking? This has the advantage of keeping effects and transitions to the proper aspect as well.
Offline

Jim Simon

  • Posts: 4456
  • Joined: Fri Dec 23, 2016 1:47 am

Re: DaVinci Resolve 17 | Feature Requests list

PostSun May 19, 2019 2:46 pm

Cary Knoop wrote:On that note, allow Cineform to process this resolution (I have been told it is NOT a Cineform limitation).


I would like this as well. But I'm curious who told you this? I thought it was a limitation of the codec, requiring dimensions properly divisible.
Offline
User avatar

Cary Knoop

  • Posts: 1182
  • Joined: Sun Mar 12, 2017 6:35 pm
  • Location: Newark, CA USA

Re: DaVinci Resolve 17 | Feature Requests list

PostSun May 19, 2019 3:38 pm

Jim Simon wrote:I would like this as well. But I'm curious who told you this? I thought it was a limitation of the codec, requiring dimensions properly divisible.

Nope, there are other NLE's which can process this aspect ratio without a problem.
Offline
User avatar

Jean Claude

  • Posts: 2973
  • Joined: Sun Jun 28, 2015 4:41 pm
  • Location: France
  • Warnings: 1

Re: DaVinci Resolve 17 | Feature Requests list

PostSun May 19, 2019 4:22 pm

Jim Simon wrote:
Cary Knoop wrote:On that note, allow Cineform to process this resolution (I have been told it is NOT a Cineform limitation).


I would like this as well. But I'm curious who told you this? I thought it was a limitation of the codec, requiring dimensions properly divisible.


Hello Jim,

Only 1 restriction :

Cineform SDK :
Code: Select all
// The image width and height must be a multiple of two
assert((width % 2) == 0 && (height % 2) == 0);

:)
"Saying it is good, but doing it is better! "
Win10-1809 | Resolve Studio V16.1 | Fusion Studio V16.1 | Decklink 4K Extreme 6G | RTX 2080Ti 431.86 NSD driver! |
Offline

Oli Koos

  • Posts: 187
  • Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2015 10:29 am

Re: DaVinci Resolve 17 | Feature Requests list

PostSun May 19, 2019 10:13 pm

How about some build in stomp templates like this one
Offline
User avatar

waltervolpatto

  • Posts: 7184
  • Joined: Thu Feb 07, 2013 5:07 pm
  • Location: 1146 North Las Palmas Ave. Hollywood, California 90038 USA

Re: DaVinci Resolve 17 | Feature Requests list

PostMon May 20, 2019 5:14 am

Jim Simon wrote:
waltervolpatto wrote:output blanking: allow to define a blanking as x/y plus a [round to near pixel] option.


Wouldn't it be better to create a timeline with the required dimensions, instead of using blanking? This has the advantage of keeping effects and transitions to the proper aspect as well.


Yes, however, not always is an option.

For "crawl", we had an original cropped camera data size of 2216x1364 (roughly, I don't remember the right pixel), with 2048x858 theatrical extraction and 2048x1152 1.78 TV extraction, plus an archival for archival required by the studio (paramount) at "source" resolution ) the 2216x1364) colored no lut applied.

As you can see I have to keep the original resolution as I go and present correct blanking as I go...
SuperServer 5039AD-I
C9X299-PGF - DDR4-2400 16x4 GB
i9-7920xCPU 12c 2.90GHz Water cooled
2x 1080ti DeckLink Studio 4K (11.4)
W10-1903 - BMR St. 16.1.1.005
nvidia: 431.86 studio
Offline

JK1995

  • Posts: 2
  • Joined: Mon May 20, 2019 7:45 am
  • Real Name: Janne Koskinen

Re: DaVinci Resolve 17 | Feature Requests list

PostMon May 20, 2019 7:58 am

I don't know if you can do this on Resolve but can you change the speed of your Transitions? Meaning if i want to for example zoom in or out a text or anything else then can i change the speed without making the clip shorter. if you can't do that then that would be a nice addition.
Offline

Tom Early

  • Posts: 1241
  • Joined: Wed Jul 17, 2013 11:01 am

Re: DaVinci Resolve 17 | Feature Requests list

PostMon May 20, 2019 9:05 am

waltervolpatto wrote:
Jim Simon wrote:
waltervolpatto wrote:output blanking: allow to define a blanking as x/y plus a [round to near pixel] option.


Wouldn't it be better to create a timeline with the required dimensions, instead of using blanking? This has the advantage of keeping effects and transitions to the proper aspect as well.


Yes, however, not always is an option.

For "crawl", we had an original cropped camera data size of 2216x1364 (roughly, I don't remember the right pixel), with 2048x858 theatrical extraction and 2048x1152 1.78 TV extraction, plus an archival for archival required by the studio (paramount) at "source" resolution ) the 2216x1364) colored no lut applied.

As you can see I have to keep the original resolution as I go and present correct blanking as I go...


Can you not create presets in Output Sizing in the Color page (i.e. not the menu) to do what you need? You can specify exact pixels there.
MBP2016, MacOS 10.14.6, 2.9 GHz Intel Core i7, 16 GB 2133 MHz LPDDR3,
Radeon Pro 460 4096 MB, Resolve Studio 16.1.1.005
Offline
User avatar

waltervolpatto

  • Posts: 7184
  • Joined: Thu Feb 07, 2013 5:07 pm
  • Location: 1146 North Las Palmas Ave. Hollywood, California 90038 USA

Re: DaVinci Resolve 17 | Feature Requests list

PostMon May 20, 2019 12:48 pm

Yes you can, why were have the blanking menu altogether then?
As a quick way to blank, it should have at least the most common geometry (DCP).

On top, if you generate a blanking preset in the timeline sizing and apply it, you will not see that: pixels will weirdly stay at 0.
SuperServer 5039AD-I
C9X299-PGF - DDR4-2400 16x4 GB
i9-7920xCPU 12c 2.90GHz Water cooled
2x 1080ti DeckLink Studio 4K (11.4)
W10-1903 - BMR St. 16.1.1.005
nvidia: 431.86 studio
Offline

BrianDors

  • Posts: 20
  • Joined: Wed Jan 23, 2019 8:03 pm
  • Real Name: Brian Dors

Re: DaVinci Resolve 17 | Feature Requests list

PostMon May 20, 2019 5:58 pm

Here is another one.

Save time code inputs in the bank (for lack of better words).

When you're on the timeline and you +200 to move 2 seconds further down the timeline it would be great if you could just keep hitting enter and moving along at that interval.

It's a tad bit tiring to keep hitting +200 ENT +200 ENT +200 ENT
WIN10
GA-Z170X-UD5 TH w/ Thunderbolt 3
i7-6700K @4 (OC'ed to 4.4) water cooled
64GB RAM @2400
GTX 1080Ti - 417.35 - DirectX12
1TB 970 EVO NVMe PCIe M.2
Resolve Studio 15.2.2
Offline
User avatar

Cary Knoop

  • Posts: 1182
  • Joined: Sun Mar 12, 2017 6:35 pm
  • Location: Newark, CA USA

Re: DaVinci Resolve 17 | Feature Requests list

PostMon May 20, 2019 7:42 pm

Allow proper nesting of timelines using timeline nodes.

Currently Resolve ignores the timeline nodes from a nested timeline.
Offline

Kenzo

  • Posts: 132
  • Joined: Sat May 04, 2013 6:04 pm
  • Real Name: Eryk Rogozinski

Re: DaVinci Resolve 17 | Feature Requests list

PostMon May 20, 2019 10:01 pm

Full support for interlaced footage, pls.
Without this, Resolve it is not suitable to work on tv. (edit)
Offline

Tom Early

  • Posts: 1241
  • Joined: Wed Jul 17, 2013 11:01 am

Re: DaVinci Resolve 17 | Feature Requests list

PostMon May 20, 2019 10:45 pm

Kenzo wrote:Full support for interlaced footage, pls.
Without this, Resolve it is not suitable to work on tv. (edit)


how does it not fully support interlaced footage?
MBP2016, MacOS 10.14.6, 2.9 GHz Intel Core i7, 16 GB 2133 MHz LPDDR3,
Radeon Pro 460 4096 MB, Resolve Studio 16.1.1.005
Offline

Kenzo

  • Posts: 132
  • Joined: Sat May 04, 2013 6:04 pm
  • Real Name: Eryk Rogozinski

Re: DaVinci Resolve 17 | Feature Requests list

PostTue May 21, 2019 12:20 am

Tom Early wrote:how does it not fully support interlaced footage?


In interlace project, all animated zoom in, zoom out are progressive, transitions are progressive, titles have one filed only, etc.
Offline

Nathan Morgan

  • Posts: 395
  • Joined: Wed May 20, 2015 3:02 pm

Re: DaVinci Resolve 17 | Feature Requests list

PostTue May 21, 2019 6:32 am

It would be helpful to be able to set the working color space of OFX and transitions in the edit page. I think best case scenario it would be a global setting for the whole timeline with per effect/transition overrides.

I am trying to use DaVinci to do finishing work and having all transitions process in the timeline color space has proved to be somewhat problematic particularly with RCM workflows and OTT deliveries.
PC: Resolve 16.1.0.055, Windows 10, GTX 1080Ti
(All bug reports etc. are PC unless specified.)
Mac: Macbook Pro 15", Resolve 16.0.0.050, 10.13.6
Terrablock 24D Shared Storage on 10G network
Offline

Jonathan Happ

  • Posts: 55
  • Joined: Tue Sep 20, 2016 4:50 pm

Re: DaVinci Resolve 17 | Feature Requests list

PostTue May 21, 2019 9:16 am

Windows(10) Version: Look for fonts in the registry, not in C-windows fonts, please!

We can't use Extensis Suitcase for Font management as long as this is the fact, and as further Resolve get's into production, the more it is necessary to be able to use specific (project / clients) fonts. And I don't want to install all the fonts on our system. Thats late 80's style ;-)
Mac OS 10.13.6
Mac Pro Late 2013
32 GB RAM
3,7 GHz Quad-Core Intel Xeon E5

Win10
Supermicro Workstation
2x Intel Xeon 2,1GHz 12C
96GB RAM
512GB SSD System
1TB SSD Cache
Nvidia GeForce RTX 2080 Ti(2x)
DeckLink 4K Extreme 12G
Internal Raid 8x 4TB SATA
Offline

Khromar

  • Posts: 1
  • Joined: Tue May 21, 2019 9:29 am
  • Real Name: Julien Warnants

Re: DaVinci Resolve 17 | Feature Requests list

PostTue May 21, 2019 9:44 am

Is it possible to add the creation of a shot Report in the mediaPool in PDF or other. A kind of report that would release a Thumbnail and selected differents metadatas ( Source TC, Length, Tape name, Clip Name, Camera, Scene, Take ...).

It's present on FilmLight Daylight but it's missing at Resolve to do a complete Rush management. I do not think it's complicated to add it would really be more.
(see next video at 17:30 -> )


(Sorry I do not speak English very well)
Offline

giacco101

  • Posts: 2
  • Joined: Tue May 21, 2019 9:25 am
  • Real Name: James Caselli

Re: DaVinci Resolve 17 | Feature Requests list

PostTue May 21, 2019 11:36 am

This has probably been requested a bagillion times, but Motion Blur for text/moving solids would be amazing.
Offline
User avatar

Rajiv Mudgal

  • Posts: 72
  • Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2013 8:03 am

Re: DaVinci Resolve 17 | Feature Requests list

PostTue May 21, 2019 9:05 pm

giacco101 wrote:This has probably been requested a bagillion times, but Motion Blur for text/moving solids would be amazing.

Its already there on the Fusion Page esp. Have you tried using the text+.
https://www.imdb.com/name/nm8500260/
Offline

Greg Hodgins

  • Posts: 8
  • Joined: Fri Nov 10, 2017 8:20 pm

Re: DaVinci Resolve 17 | Feature Requests list

PostWed May 22, 2019 1:25 am

Being able to create another viewport like Fusion stand alone has. Works well with a triple monitor set up. Also working in 3D space on a 50" panel is much better than the cut down viewport in DR 16.
Offline

Greg Hodgins

  • Posts: 8
  • Joined: Fri Nov 10, 2017 8:20 pm

Re: DaVinci Resolve 17 | Feature Requests list

PostWed May 22, 2019 1:49 am

Also, being able to CHOOSE how much vram your GPU has, again like Fusion allows. I have HBCC on Vega that allows the use of system ram to supplement vram.
Offline
User avatar

waltervolpatto

  • Posts: 7184
  • Joined: Thu Feb 07, 2013 5:07 pm
  • Location: 1146 North Las Palmas Ave. Hollywood, California 90038 USA

Re: DaVinci Resolve 17 | Feature Requests list

PostWed May 22, 2019 1:56 am

Greg Hodgins wrote:Also, being able to CHOOSE how much vram your GPU has, again like Fusion allows. I have HBCC on Vega that allows the use of system ram to supplement vram.


mmm.. I think that will absolutely kill the performance... too many Gbits passing back and forth...
SuperServer 5039AD-I
C9X299-PGF - DDR4-2400 16x4 GB
i9-7920xCPU 12c 2.90GHz Water cooled
2x 1080ti DeckLink Studio 4K (11.4)
W10-1903 - BMR St. 16.1.1.005
nvidia: 431.86 studio
Offline

Nathan Morgan

  • Posts: 395
  • Joined: Wed May 20, 2015 3:02 pm

Re: DaVinci Resolve 17 | Feature Requests list

PostWed May 22, 2019 3:14 am

It would be great if sizing transforms in the color page (specifically node & output) were processed using the full native clip resolution and not the timeline resolution.

This would help to ensure highest image quality for situations/workflows where you would need to size the image up after the input sizing operation.
PC: Resolve 16.1.0.055, Windows 10, GTX 1080Ti
(All bug reports etc. are PC unless specified.)
Mac: Macbook Pro 15", Resolve 16.0.0.050, 10.13.6
Terrablock 24D Shared Storage on 10G network
Offline

MakoSports

  • Posts: 1
  • Joined: Wed May 22, 2019 8:15 am
  • Real Name: TJ Strother

Re: DaVinci Resolve 17 | Feature Requests list

PostWed May 22, 2019 8:17 am

Please add an audio waveform reaction effect.
Offline

Charles Lyons

  • Posts: 44
  • Joined: Mon Dec 04, 2017 8:18 pm

Re: DaVinci Resolve 17 | Feature Requests list

PostWed May 22, 2019 8:20 am

My #1 request for Resolve 17:

No new features. Just fix bugs, improve stability, and refine the features that are already there.
Resolve Studio 14.3.0.014 (trying 15.3.1.003, may switch back)
iMac Pro 10-core 3.0 GHz Xeon
64GB RAM / Vega 64 GPU w 16GB VRAM / 2TB SSD
High Sierra 10.13.4 (17E199)
Offline

luz_mueller

  • Posts: 3
  • Joined: Wed May 22, 2019 9:57 am
  • Real Name: Luzius Müller

Re: DaVinci Resolve 17 | Feature Requests list

PostWed May 22, 2019 10:08 am

- Timeline Versions
- Keyframe Animation in Submixes in Fairlight
Luzius Müller
DOP/Colorist
Filmerei GmbH
8005 Zürich
Switzerland

www.filmerei.ch
Offline

SamBroggs

  • Posts: 74
  • Joined: Thu Aug 31, 2017 7:40 pm

Re: DaVinci Resolve 17 | Feature Requests list

PostWed May 22, 2019 4:44 pm

I want to be able to see my timeline Markers when I view it in the source window. I am logging footage with timeline Markers, but after that I have to edit these bits in the new timeline. So I need to put the timeline in the source window, but then I cannot see any Markers..

If that's not possible:
Shortcuts to switch the active timeline (like in premiere), so I can do copy and paste via keyboard.

And better fairlight performance, that's the only very slow panel on my Mac.
mbp late 2012, 16gb ram, 2,6ghz, geforce GT650M, davinci resolve 15
Offline

Christopher Kou

  • Posts: 46
  • Joined: Tue Mar 25, 2014 11:37 pm

Re: DaVinci Resolve 17 | Feature Requests list

PostWed May 22, 2019 5:13 pm

Since I am shooting both Panasonic EVA1 and Nikon Z6 to Atomos recorders . . .

Prores RAW is the big one for me. EVA1 outputs RAW 5.6K, and Nikon Z6 will soon be outputting 12bit RAW over HDMI.
Offline

joeyciccoline

  • Posts: 3
  • Joined: Tue Jan 02, 2018 5:12 pm

Re: DaVinci Resolve 17 | Feature Requests list

PostWed May 22, 2019 6:24 pm

Fusion:
Support for multi-channel EXR in Resolve's Fusion. It's the big thing missing for compositing from a 3D pipeline which would be great to be able to do in resolve inline with the edit instead of in the standalone Fusion app.

It will probably never come, but it would be great to move away from the database approach and to a file-based one for projects.
Offline

Timber

  • Posts: 31
  • Joined: Sat Feb 09, 2019 5:23 am
  • Real Name: Tim Sassoon

Re: DaVinci Resolve 17 | Feature Requests list

PostWed May 22, 2019 7:15 pm

I'd very much like to be able to turn off either audio or video in Clip Attributes. It's a pain to have to unlink lots of clips and delete the unwanted property (usually audio).
Offline

Greg Hodgins

  • Posts: 8
  • Joined: Fri Nov 10, 2017 8:20 pm

Re: DaVinci Resolve 17 | Feature Requests list

PostWed May 22, 2019 10:40 pm

waltervolpatto wrote:
Greg Hodgins wrote:Also, being able to CHOOSE how much vram your GPU has, again like Fusion allows. I have HBCC on Vega that allows the use of system ram to supplement vram.


mmm.. I think that will absolutely kill the performance... too many Gbits passing back and forth...


It does very well in stand alone Fusion. I have ran a 8GB card to 30GB without issue. In DR the Fusion settings still allow me to choose, though I prefer working in the stand alone version, so why not DR as a whole?
Offline

Timber

  • Posts: 31
  • Joined: Sat Feb 09, 2019 5:23 am
  • Real Name: Tim Sassoon

Re: DaVinci Resolve 17 | Feature Requests list

PostWed May 22, 2019 11:18 pm

Because I had to work quickly with the director this morning I jammed a dozen H264 and H265 4K camera files into my 1080p edit of a 3-minute music video. Then I hit Render to YouTube preset to send the director a version and went to lunch, expecting it to be way done when I got back. Two hours later, Resolve had only rendered 3% (!!!!) of a 3-minute HD show. This is running 115% of CPU and 186 threads on a quad-core i7 MBP.

Two thirds of the shots were ProRes, and pretty sure they aren't the problem. But sometimes like today I don't have time to transcode everything (in After Effects), and people shoot with all kinds of cameras - an A7R2 to XAVC and a GoPro Hero7 to H265, but on this show mostly Canon .CR2 RAW files, which I do transcode.

There are a lot of thing I like about Resolve as an editor, mainly that I can work on color concurrently, but the TERRIBLE performance with H264/H265 might be a dealbreaker. Which would be a shame, because I've noticed that Resolve sees further into the white point with Sony XAVC files than Adobe products do.
Offline
User avatar

Jack Swart

  • Posts: 601
  • Joined: Fri Aug 15, 2014 8:09 pm
  • Location: Sydney, Australia

Re: DaVinci Resolve 17 | Feature Requests list

PostWed May 22, 2019 11:23 pm

Render out to ProRes and then use Handbrake to go to H264.
For a 3 min clip I'd have that done before you could order lunch.

EDIT:
I just went from 4K 265 to HD 264 thru resolve. 3 min timeline took 3 mins to encode to 264


So it seems it is not the software.

BTW I'm on 16b3
DR 16.1 Studio, 2012 Mac Pro 5.1, 10.13.6, 2x3.46GHz 6 core Intel, 96 GB ram, GTX 1080Ti 11GB graphics card.
USB3 card, BM SDI 4K card, PCIe SSD boot disk, 3x4TB SSDs in raid 0, 12TB HDD backup.
Tangent Elements TK panel, FSI DM240, 55"LG C8 OLED
Offline

Jim Simon

  • Posts: 4456
  • Joined: Fri Dec 23, 2016 1:47 am

Re: DaVinci Resolve 17 | Feature Requests list

PostThu May 23, 2019 1:56 am

joeyciccoline wrote:it would be great to move away from the database approach and to a file-based one for projects.


I prefer the current design. You can always export out individual project files when needed.
Offline

Jim Simon

  • Posts: 4456
  • Joined: Fri Dec 23, 2016 1:47 am

Re: DaVinci Resolve 17 | Feature Requests list

PostThu May 23, 2019 1:57 am

Timber wrote: It's a pain to have to unlink lots of clips and delete the unwanted property (usually audio).


Why are you adding what you don't need to a timeline?
Offline

Jim Simon

  • Posts: 4456
  • Joined: Fri Dec 23, 2016 1:47 am

Re: DaVinci Resolve 17 | Feature Requests list

PostThu May 23, 2019 1:59 am

Timber wrote:the TERRIBLE performance with H264/H265 might be a dealbreaker.


I find the performance in 16 much improved. I used to need Optimized Media for my 4K GH4 files. Now I don't. Same hardware.
Offline

Tim Lota

  • Posts: 147
  • Joined: Fri Dec 13, 2013 12:48 pm
  • Location: Essen, GER

Re: DAVINCI 17 | Big feature request list.

PostThu May 23, 2019 7:10 am

Micha Clazing wrote:ProRes export on Windows, and moveable/sizeable docking UI elements please.


Joshua Morin wrote:Full screen on a second monitor please!


That.

And auto-transparency when cropping in Edit would be great.
Offline

Fabián Matas

  • Posts: 130
  • Joined: Wed Aug 22, 2012 9:35 am

Re: DaVinci Resolve 17 | Feature Requests list

PostThu May 23, 2019 8:58 am

Ok here is my list:

-Improved node tree displaying. When working with fixed node tree the size can be huge deal.

-Qualify selection on ACES. This can be applied in general but the ability of choosing the qualify after the ODT in my opinion can be a hugeee improvement.

-Related, ability to break the order of nodes on secondary selections. That means being able to send back tracked windows on previous nodes or qualify on other stages of the image tree.

-Ability to select what scopes i want(tree vector) or even better profiles i can change with a shortcut.

-For heavy node tree 4k raw footage(like r3d) the render should give you the choice to render half the tree and do it again with the other half when GPU memory is full.

-Shortcuts to move around timeline/group/clip/pre-group

-Please more love to the panels specially that fx button!!!!

Thats all :D
Offline

Drakulica

  • Posts: 41
  • Joined: Tue Nov 20, 2018 8:10 am
  • Real Name: Aleksandar Petran

Re: DaVinci Resolve 17 | Feature Requests list

PostThu May 23, 2019 11:48 am

Capture.JPG
Capture.JPG (39.58 KiB) Viewed 5531 times



When i CUT the clip its automaticly selected left clip. It would be better if the right side of the clip is selected because then I can continue to cut the clip because cursor go to the right side.
Offline
User avatar

KevsterZA

  • Posts: 20
  • Joined: Thu Mar 22, 2018 7:25 pm
  • Real Name: Kevin Heydenrych

Re: DaVinci Resolve 17 | Feature Requests list

PostThu May 23, 2019 3:16 pm

I am loving DR16 but please please please....

  • A simple way to switch on a grid without having to load the "adjustment clip" and "grid" effects into the timeline. I really wish this was a on/off button with basic settings easily accessible on the edit page (or as a function on the inspector) to be used when positioning video. The current "grid" effect is good, but make that a function within inspector instead.
  • Muuuuch better VST plugin management in Fairlight. The fact that there is no plugin search button, folder options, plugin favourites option etc is a little incomprehensible to me given how Fairlight's capabilities are touted. Any of the other DAW's out there can act as a model. Coming from the audio world and having built up my plugin collection I am literally scrolling through hundreds of plug ins to get to the ones I want. One hell of a waist of time
  • The ability to move VST plugin's around in the list. Also a little incomphrensible to me in an environment that is aimed at post production
  • Option to make the wave form bigger in the cut page. Trying to edit to low volume spoken word can be a real challenge at the mo

Thank you! Please note I really love DR16, but these are my bug bears
www.owlmusic.co.za
Gear: Windows 10 i7, MSI 1050 Ti GPU, 16 gig ram. Burl Audio B16
Offline

Jim Simon

  • Posts: 4456
  • Joined: Fri Dec 23, 2016 1:47 am

Re: DaVinci Resolve 17 | Feature Requests list

PostThu May 23, 2019 3:24 pm

Fabián Matas wrote:-Qualify selection on ACES. This can be applied in general but the ability of choosing the qualify after the ODT in my opinion can be a hugeee improvement.


I'm a fan of ACES. I use it on every project. But what does that mean? What quality adjustments are you looking for?
Offline

Jim Simon

  • Posts: 4456
  • Joined: Fri Dec 23, 2016 1:47 am

Re: DaVinci Resolve 17 | Feature Requests list

PostThu May 23, 2019 3:28 pm

Drakulica wrote:When i CUT the clip its automaticly selected left clip.


In 16b3, cutting a clip with the tool or shortcut selects neither side, which is the preferred behavior. Cutting and selecting are two different actions. Performing one should not automatically engage the other.
Offline

Fabián Matas

  • Posts: 130
  • Joined: Wed Aug 22, 2012 9:35 am

Re: DaVinci Resolve 17 | Feature Requests list

PostThu May 23, 2019 4:05 pm

Jim Simon wrote:
Fabián Matas wrote:-Qualify selection on ACES. This can be applied in general but the ability of choosing the qualify after the ODT in my opinion can be a hugeee improvement.


I'm a fan of ACES. I use it on every project. But what does that mean? What quality adjustments are you looking for?


Sorry im not a native english speaker so sometimes my sentences are a mess. I mean use the qualifier tool after the odt so the selection should (in theory) be easier since the picture rendering(rrt) has already happened and the gamma have been applied so you have a more saturated and rich image( if you do a higlight when working with aces you can see image in ACES space is mushy and greyish, as it shoiuld be).
PreviousNext

Return to DaVinci Resolve Feature Requests

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests