Tue Oct 13, 2020 1:30 pm
Peter, thanks for advice regarding <1-year old on GPUs, and for sharing that website, which is new to me. My question; is there a document or link with general guidelines regarding CPU/GPUs for Resolve?
Basically, a overview type document, which discusses the way things are processed and explains when you're wise to throw CPU cycles at the problem, and when GPU is best? Plus the role of RAM in both. Perhaps with a birdwalk into which approach is best for playback versus rendering (presuming they're different requirements). For example;
1. When does it make sense to use a 1080, 2080, 3090, or Quadro GPU?
2. When does it make sense (if ever) to throw more RAM at things, e.g. 16, 32, 64GB?
3. When is the CPU the bottleneck, e.g. what's generally good enough to edit with HD footage, 4K, or 8K, or is all the work largely offloaded to the GPU so there's no special need to edit on more than an XXXX processor?
4. Also, does an external monitor affect playback, and thus is desireable.
Anyway, my present editing PC was built to handle SD within Vegas and while it's an i7 with 1080 card and 32GB of RAM, it's two years old, e.g. rather long in tooth. Thus, I figure to build out something new for the move to Resolve and some guidelines would be helpful.
Lastly, and if it matters to your response; I've purchased an ATEM Mini ISO, am about to purchase four BMPCC 4K. Deliverables are in HD for YouTube (but who knows what the 4K-future may be so at least 2-years of utility would be nice).
Finally, thanks for your time because I know without asking you're a busy guy.
--
John Beech