Suggestions list

Messages of this color make sense.
Messages of this color are made.
Messages of this color are empty chatter.

1. If you suddenly do not know, then in the Fusion in "Edit Controls" after changing the RGB keys, they do not display correctly and do not work. https://ibb.co/j6Wsdwn
2. By the way, why is the slider in the splines somehow strange displayed? https://ibb.co/CJrvpXY
3. Add an option in splines so that do not have to constantly press Ctrl + T.
4. Add a setting to keep the highlighted node (save selected node). Then I switched to "Edit", and then again to Fusion and the Last node stands out.
5. Add the ability to move composition by pressing a key. https://ibb.co/2ZYkrMk
6. Make the parameter "Show Only Selected Tool" remember so that when I turned it on it was always on at the project level.
Let's say we have a project 123. After enabling the parameter "Show Only Selected Tool" in all new and already created compositions this parameter must be enabled.
7. If I accidentally delete a composition, I need to be able to return the action by clicking Ctrl+Z. https://ibb.co/2ZYkrMk
8. Add the ability to invert keyframes (which now work by hotkey V) vertically and horizontally. https://ibb.co/vXPvbvM
9. Make that the position is maintained when switching the composition, and indeed after any switching. https://ibb.co/KxvD9TB
10. Why does the adjustment layer display such a large number of frames? Make it so that if I measured 30 frames, then in Fusion it would be displayed as 30 frames. Let it look at least outwardly like 30 frames, so as not to get confused. https://ibb.co/f2C7SQ3
11. In fusion, when I double-click on the text under the clips, it changes. Need to make it remember the choice at the project level or add an option to the settings to indicate which view suits me best. https://ibb.co/Fz8kGKy
12. And you can make it so that when I right-click on the clips at the top, I can choose how to display the clips. How now it’s normal but need to add and smaller icons. https://ibb.co/Fz8kGKy

Problems:
1. After the last two or three updates, Davinci often just closes. And almost always, when closing, an error appears with the words "Send an error report?" I completely deleted davinci and even folders in the system, reinstalled from scratch, but it did not help.
2. In Fusion when I press the Ctrl+Z
information is not updated. But as soon as I switch to another node and back, it is updated. I noticed this when working with key frames. And this appeared in the latest version of Davinci 16.1.1.005
3. If you replace the picture under the adjustment layer, it will not be updated. You have to change the proxy and then it will be updated.

1. I created a macro and when creating it indicated which controls I need.
2. Then I changed some controls and they look like this. https://ibb.co/6Rrs9wY https://ibb.co/Ry8jJFk
3. After the project was closed, everything was mixed up. https://ibb.co/0M5CRrK
If you disconnect the macro, then nothing will change. But if you delete, and then press Ctrl+Z, then the position will change again. https://ibb.co/Ry8jJFk
It would be cool to sort your buttons right in the inspector. For example, when you hold down some keys.

Look, let's say we have a Transform node. If you look at her control, then there you can find the line (blank). Why, after I change this "blank" and then restart the program, it disappears. I want to add this line (blank) to separate the controls, and for sorting I need to change it, but after that it disappears.

Make this toolbar not overlap the image, but shift it.

Add to Fusion the ability to see how much time it takes to load. Suppose I made a transition, and when I added additional effects, I want to know how much longer the download will take with a new effect.

Look, let's say in Fusion I have 2 transform nodes.
In two nodes I made changes. Why, when in the first (in the account) node I put Blend at 1, and in the second 0, then everything quickly shifts and everything works in the EDIT tab. But if in the first node I put Blend at 0, and in the second 1, then in Fusion
loading takes a long time, and in the EDIT tab does not play at all. Simply put, you need to make sure that when you set 0 to Blend, the information that has changed in the node should not be updated until Blend is again 1. And the information passing through the node with Blend 0 should simply pass through as if this node were not at all. Since I'm adding a few nodes now, in all I set Blend to 0, and the PC loads, as if all the nodes are turned on.

Add the ability to sort buttons, sliders, and more when creating a macro. So that you can add buttons after the change through the "Edits Controls" tab so that everything is displayed correctly and that the inputs do not go down after the change, but keep the position that I want. Also, so that there is a separate key for adding blank (partitions). Now I can’t sort the buttons and sliders normally, for this I need to know how to write macros, but you don’t have such information.

1. Need to add a hot key for the "Custom Scale"(So that I can specify a hotkey that I like.). BUT, do better that all settings are saved. So that any new project or current one keeps the Scale after the program closes. https://ibb.co/pXxj6nr - Done in version 16.2.3!
2. Please make it so that all these parameters are saved. Because now after creating the project, you need to reconfigure everything again, and this is an extra waste of time. https://ibb.co/0VfHXJV


[/color]

Why doesn't your program read GIFs?

Proxy does not work. Nearly always i see this.

Now marker and color don't saves. Add plz this opportunity.
Make it so when you drag the adjustment layer into the power-box so that the color and markers are preserved.

Add plz this opportunity. This need for transition.

Add the ability to create folders, sort them, and when adding an adjustment layer or transition, a file is created along the specified path.
C:\Program Files\Blackmagic Design\DaVinci Resolve\Fusion\Templates\Edit\Custom

Add up to Fusion Transition the ability to limit the maximum and minimum length transition. For example
if you specify the value of 1 second, then when you try to stretch the transition, it does not stretch for more than 1 second.

If add a Transform node and select Mirror in the Edges, and add a Lens Distort node with Distort mode, add Distortion (0.5). Everything is rendered for a very long time, it’s very long straight. But if you specify a negative value in Quartic Distortion, for example, -0.01, then everything renders 10 times faster. Fix this problem.

In the Prismatic blur node in the version DaVinci_Resolve_16.2.1_Windows, a transparent line is very noticeable. With the Vortex node the same problem.

Why is the transition inserted between the video and not on top of the video? Can't be done normal? Why was it decided to do just that? If you use Fusion Templates and the adjustment layer for transitions, then the adjustment layer saves time several times, since you just place the adjustment layer on top of the video and everything works fine and quickly. But when we use Fusion Templates, it is something strange and inconvenient. Make the transition be on top of the video and not between the videos.

Very often for unknown reasons Shift + R does not work. The cursor is on the clip, but nothing happens after clicking. After restarting the program, everything works.

Why is the transition inserted between the video and not on top of the video? Can't be done normal? Why was it decided to do just that? If you use Fusion Templates and the adjustment layer for transitions, then the adjustment layer saves time several times, since you just place the adjustment layer on top of the video and everything works fine and quickly. But when we use Fusion Templates, it is something strange and inconvenient. Make the transition be on top of the video and not between the videos.

It wouldn't make any sense to put transitions above the footage and that isn't a "normal" way to put in transitions. Transitions denote transitions between two clips thus they're between two clip. And adjustment layer would have no idea that it's even hovering over an edit and wouldn't know how to use the footage below it.

In the Prismatic blur node in the version DaVinci_Resolve_16.2.1_Windows, a transparent line is very noticeable. With the Vortex node the same problem.

Because this is what a prism looks like this.



And vortex isn't the same effect.

If add a Transform node and select Mirror in the Edges, and add a Lens Distort node with Distort mode, add Distortion (0.5). Everything is rendered for a very long time, it’s very long straight. But if you specify a negative value in Quartic Distortion, for example, -0.01, then everything renders 10 times faster. Fix this problem.

Good catch.

But if you want this effect, why not just use LensDistortion in the Color or Edit page with Edge Behavior set to Reflect? Then the effect would be real time and you don't even need to deal with a transform node or Fusion comps in general. A lot of people seem to jump right into Fusion even when it's not needed.

Add up to Fusion Transition the ability to limit the maximum and minimum length transition. For example
if you specify the value of 1 second, then when you try to stretch the transition, it does not stretch for more than 1 second.

I don't see what the point of that would be.

Add plz this opportunity. This need for transition.

I don't understand what the request is for.

Now marker and color don't saves. Add plz this opportunity.
Make it so when you drag the adjustment layer into the power-box so that the color and markers are preserved.

I think the bigger problem here is that Fusion Comps can't have a color assigned to them in the Media Pool at all. Fusion compositions aren't treated like regular media in Resolve so they're always just blue.

Also are you using a marker to mark the midpoint for a transition? That's exactly why transitions are applied as effects to cuts and not placed on another track.

Simply put, you need to make sure that when you set 0 to Blend, the information that has changed in the node should not be updated until Blend is again 1. And the information passing through the node with Blend 0 should simply pass through as if this node were not at all. Since I'm adding a few nodes now, in all I set Blend to 0, and the PC loads, as if all the nodes are turned on.

Many nodes I have a "Process when Blend is 0.0" beneath the blend. I'm not sure why this isn't the case with Transforms but I know they're treated differently than most other nodes because they aren't done in steps, they're sort of merged across nodes to preserve transform quality. That's why there's a Flatten Transform option.

You shouldn't be setting Blend to 0 to disable nodes though. You should just disable the nodes with Ctr+P.

Regarding transitions, at the moment, a transition made from the adjustment layer several times increases the speed of working with it, compared to Fusion Transitions. Here is an example. I made a video cut, place the adjustment layer on top and enjoy the result. And when I use Fusion Transitions I have to cut the video again (reduce the length of the video) and all by the fact that the transition is inserted between the video, and not from the top as in the adjustment layer. If the adjustment layer could:
1. Stretch evenly as a Fusion Transition.
2. Change the settings without switching to Fusion as in Fusion Transition.
3. To save the adjustment layer as Fusion Transition, then everyone would immediately use the adjustment layer.
DaVinci developers / tech support already wrote to me. I know how transitions work, but it’s a huge waste of time every time after adding a transition to trim the video. Using Freeze time is even worse.

I know how transitions work...

No I don't think you do because your idea makes zero sense.

Here is an example. I made a video cut, place the adjustment layer on top and enjoy the result.

You clearly aren't making a transition then. An adjustment layer would have no idea what clips A and B would be. If anything you're just hiding a cut which isn't the same as a transition.

And when I use Fusion Transitions I have to cut the video again (reduce the length of the video) and all by the fact that the transition is inserted between the video, and not from the top as in the adjustment layer.

You don't have to make any additional cuts to add a transition between clips. You may need to trim the end of clip A and the beginning of clip B so that there's enough footage to last the length of the transition but that's inherent to how any transition works. If you're applying a transition that begins before clip B begins and ends after clip A ends then it isn't an actual transition, you're just hiding a cut. Dips are the only thing that's typically considered a transition that that doesn't apply to and that's because dips aren't transitions between two clips.

If the adjustment layer could:
1. Stretch evenly as a Fusion Transition.

The more useful feature would be to allow Fusion transitions to scale unevenly like a regular transition can.

2. Change the settings without switching to Fusion as in Fusion Transition.

What you want is something like Fusion effects which I suggest in this topic.

viewtopic.php?f=33&t=108183#p642676

3. To save the adjustment layer as Fusion Transition, then everyone would immediately use the adjustment layer.

Again, an adjustment layer would have no idea what clips would be used as input media. You're talking about a type of clip that can be applied anywhere, not just at cuts, and applies to any video clips below it.

If you use Shift + R, Fusion Transitions does not work.

Yes it does. It works the same as if it's applying a transition between two stills.

You may need to trim the end of clip A and the beginning of clip B so that there's enough footage to last the length of the transition but that's inherent to how any transition works.

This is the problem that I encounter all the time. To have enough information you still need to trim the video (yes, not always, but still). And this is an extra waste of time. Anyone who tries two options (adjustment layer and Fusion Transitions) will immediately say that the second one takes several times more time.

I did a 5-minute video editing with about 10 transitions. When adding transitions consisting of an adjustment layer, I spent 5 minutes on it. Then I did it using Fusion Transitions and spent 19 minutes on it. That’s the difference.
In this situation, I see 2 exits, or add to the adjustment layers:
1. The ability to stretch the transition evenly, as in Fusion Transitions.
2. The ability to change the transition settings without switching to Fusion as in Fusion Transitions.
3. The ability to save the adjustment layer as a Fusion Transition.
Or make Fusion Transitions take the information we see. That is, for example, we have 2 clips ((clip1) 1 2 3 4 5 6) and (6 5 4 3 2 1 (clip2))
Now the transition uses 6 7 and 7 6 frames. And you need to make sure that the transition uses only 6 and 6. And so that on 6 and 6 it shows the transition. Now I’m directly adding a transition, and although the transition needs 30 frames for one part of the clip (60 frames the whole transition), it still takes another 2-3 frames. That is, in total it takes 32-33 frames, although it should take 30. That's the problem. I hope google translator correctly conveyed my information.
Look this:

More example:
The transition shows that it is located at 4 5 6 and 6 5 4 frames, but uses information 5 6 7 and 8 7 6 or 5 6 7 and 7 6 5.
But it is necessary that he use those frames on which he is located. If the transition to 4 5 6 and 6 5 4, then it should use 4 5 6 and 6 5 4. Otherwise, WE spend a huge amount of time doing work instead of a program.

This is the problem that I encounter all the time. To have enough information you still need to trim the video (yes, not always, but still). And this is an extra waste of time. Anyone who tries two options (adjustment layer and Fusion Transitions) will immediately say that the second one takes several times more time.

If you're using an adjustment layer than it isn't transitioning between anything.

I did a 5-minute video editing with about 10 transitions. When adding transitions consisting of an adjustment layer, I spent 5 minutes on it. Then I did it using Fusion Transitions and spent 19 minutes on it. That’s the difference.

Then the problem is your understanding of the software not the program. A transition by definition needs to be aware of what the incoming and outgoing clips are. Adjustment clips just work on a flattened version the clips beneath them. They don't know if there is a cut beneath them or if there's any media beneath them at all and they don't care.

Anything that you're doing on the adjustment layer that you're using as a transition is simply hiding a cut and isn't a transition at all.

In this situation, I see 2 exits, or add to the adjustment layers:
1. The ability to stretch the transition evenly, as in Fusion Transitions.
2. The ability to change the transition settings without switching to Fusion as in Fusion Transitions.
3. The ability to save the adjustment layer as a Fusion Transition.

You said all this before. It still makes zero sense and my responses are the same as they were before.

Or make Fusion Transitions take the information we see. That is, for example, we have 2 clips ((clip1) 1 2 3 4 5 6) and (6 5 4 3 2 1 (clip2))
Now the transition uses 6 7 and 7 6 frames.

That's what they already do. That's why if you don't have frames before the cut then you need to shorten the front. In order to do a transition that starts 6 frames before the cut and 6 frames afterwards then clip A needs to have at least 6 frames after the cut and clip B needs to have at least 6 frames before the cut.

The Cut page shows you visually why certain clips need you to trim them.



In this example, the transition can't go any longer than 12 frames before and after the cut because clips both end.



If we give move Clip A forward and Clip B backwards then we have more frames and the transition can become longer. Putting the transition in an adjustment layer above the clip doesn't magically make add frames to the footage.

And you need to make sure that the transition uses only 6 and 6. And so that on 6 and 6 it shows the transition. Now I’m directly adding a transition, and although the transition needs 30 frames for one part of the clip (60 frames the whole transition), it still takes another 2-3 frames. That is, in total it takes 32-33 frames, although it should take 30. That's the problem.

If the transition is supposed to be 60 frames then you needs 60 frames from each clip, not 30 and 30. Think about what a cross dissolve is doing.

At frame 1 of the transition, Clip B is already being blended into Clip A. At frame 30, both clips are blended equally. At frame 60, Clip A is still just barely being blended in.

I hope google translator correctly conveyed my information.

I'm pretty sure it is. If you don't think it's doing a good job then try using more pictures to explain things.

Think about what a cross dissolve is doing.

I did not use cross-dissolve, and indeed I took this transition as an example, there are a bunch of other transitions that have a different working principle and the same problem there.

Then the problem is your understanding of the software not the program.

I am well with understanding. You simply did not use two options, so you are unlikely to understand something. The man who used both knows the difference.
You write a lot. And you write information that I know. I’m not trying to understand how the transition works, I’m saying that it needs to be improved, because now it sucks.
If the transition needs 60 frames, then you need to make it so that it takes 30 frames from one clip and 30 frames from another, and not 60 each.

I am well with understanding. You simply did not use two options, so you are unlikely to understand something. The man who used both knows the difference.

Again, if you're using an adjustment layer to do something as a transition than it isn't an actual transition.

If you disagree then explain to me what transition you're doing that doesn't need to know what clip A and B are.

I’m not trying to understand how the transition works, I’m saying that it needs to be improved, because now it sucks.

It works in the exact way that transitions work in all programs. It doesn't suck. It's as straightforward as it could possibly be.

If the transition needs 60 frames, then you need to make it so that it takes 30 frames from one clip and 30 frames from another, and not 60 each.

That's not a transition. That's just something that hides a cut. If you'd like for a Fusion transition to supports a form of transition that just hide cuts then ask for that. There no advantage to doing the same thing with adjustment clips.

As I already mentioned, something like a Dip to Black is a type of transition that would need 30 frames from one clip and 30 frames from another to do a 60 frame transition but that's because it's not blending the two clips at all, it's just hiding a cut by fading out clip A then fading in Clip B. The clips could even have a gap between them and it would still work. You could also look at it as being two dissolves.

It works in the exact way that transitions work in all programs. It doesn't suck. It's as straightforward as it could possibly be.

In all? For example, in which?

As far as i heard, the same Sony Vegas (but I could be wrong) does something like a reverse and slow, and the user does not have to manually finish anything.

In all? For example, in which?

Premiere Pro
Media Composer
Final Cut Pro X
Vegas Pro
PowerDirector
Hitfilm Express
Edius
Pinnacle Studio

Kdenlive does it in similar way but involves clips A and B being on different tracks.

As far as i heard, the same Sony Vegas (but I could be wrong) does something like a reverse and slow, and the user does not have to manually finish anything.

I'm not sure what you mean by reverse and slow. Vegas works like audio software. Clips overlap to create cross fade then you apply a transition effect to that area.

And what do you have to manually finish in Resolve?

I mean that it’s not necessary to trim the video itself to add a transition, it makes part of the video that is required for the transition in reverse and seems to slow down a bit.

At a minimum, can make it so that when you add a transition and there are not enough frames, it asks you, for example, "Do you want to create a freeze frame for the transition?" Click "yes" and he at the end of the clip creates a freeze frame with the desired number of frames for the transition.
Ideally, it would be cool if adjustment layers could be saved with markers, cut and color. And also for customization so that you don’t have to switch to Fusion. Hope davinci will do it.

I mean that it’s not necessary to trim the video itself to add a transition, it makes part of the video that is required for the transition in reverse and seems to slow down a bit.

I haven't seen any NLE do that. Both would be really undesirable behavior.

You aren't actually trimming the clip in Davinci Resolve. You can use the whole clip but the first frames of the clip have to start where the transition starts.

At a minimum, can make it so that when you add a transition and there are not enough frames, it asks you, for example, "Do you want to create a freeze frame for the transition?" Click "yes" and he at the end of the clip creates a freeze frame with the desired number of frames for the transition.

Freeze frames would work.

Ideally, it would be cool if adjustment layers could be saved with markers, cut and color.

What do you mean by "cut"?

And also for customization so that you don’t have to switch to Fusion.

The better way to do that is for BMD to allow people to create reusable effects in Fusion that can be applied to Adjustment Clips.

Freeze frames would work.

Yes, they are working now, but I do it myself, it would be faster if the program itself did it.

What do you mean by "cut"?

Now if you cut the adjustment layer, then bind to each other and try to save in smart bin or power bin, it will not save. It would be cool to add this feature. Color and markers also does not save now.

The better way to do that is for BMD to allow people to create reusable effects in Fusion that can be applied to Adjustment Clips.

This is not the best way. The best way to give people an adjustment layer in which everything is already there.

You can use the whole clip but the first frames of the clip have to start where the transition starts.

can you shoot a video how do you do it and how to add a transition if I don’t want to crop it?

Yes, they are working now, but I do it myself, it would be faster if the program itself did it.

Agreed that might be a decent idea for them to add.

Now if you cut the adjustment layer, then bind to each other and try to save in smart bin or power bin, it will not save. It would be cool to add this feature.

That's because once you cut a clip it becomes two clips.

ThisThe best way to give people an adjustment layer in which everything is already there.

I completely disagree. If you have an effect that doesn't rely on any specific input media then there's no point in specifically saving an adjustment layer with that effect on it when you could just save an effect that can be placed on any kind of clip (including an adjustment clip) in both the Edit page and Color pages.

It's better to have a few simple and versatile concepts than to have a bunch of more limited ones.

May I ask what kind of work you do that would require constantly re-using an adjustment layer with a Fusion composition on it? I find that a lot of people use Fusion when it makes more sense to use the Color page or Edit FX for something.

can you shoot a video how do you do it and how to add a transition if I don’t want to crop it?

What I described is exactly what happens when you apply a transition and it asks you to trim it. It says it's "trimmed" because some of those frames are before the cut but you're still using those frames in the transition.

That's what I was showing in this picture.

https://i.imgur.com/cCprAox.png

The top clip is Clip A, the bottom clip is Clip B. Clip A ends on the last frame of the transition while Clip B begins at the first frame of the transition. The gray parts of the clips are the parts that were "trimmed".

That's what I was showing in this picture.
https://i.imgur.com/cCprAox.png

I already wrote that I know this.

May I ask what kind of work you do that would require constantly re-using an adjustment layer with a Fusion composition on it? I find that a lot of people use Fusion when it makes more sense to use the Color page or Edit FX for something.

I already wrote above, I tested 2 options, and using a transition that is made of an adjustment layer increases the speed of working with them at times. At least 3 times faster. Moreover, given that I trained to work with both adjustment layers and Fusion Transitions.
This is me about the fact that at the moment the adjustment layer is easier and very fast to use for use as a transition than Fusion Transitions. Fusion Transitions require more more more time.

I already wrote above, I tested 2 options, and using a transition that is made of an adjustment layer increases the speed of working with them at times. At least 3 times faster. Moreover, given that I trained to work with both adjustment layers and Fusion Transitions. This is me about the fact that at the moment the adjustment layer is easier and very fast to use for use as a transition than Fusion Transitions. Fusion Transitions require more more more time.

No. You're not understanding my question. I was asking what you do that requires you to use Fusion compositions so much. Are you just using it them for fake transition effects on adjustment layers? If so, then what kinds of transitions are you doing with the adjustment layer?

I'm looking back at the screenshots you posted in previous posts.


In this one you seem to just be making a simple zoom transition.


Here it looks like you just made a simple directional blur transition.

In this video you're just using a Resolve effect.

You don't need to use Fusion transitions for any of those things. You can do them by just dragging those effects from the Effects Library onto an Adjustment Clip in the Edit page and adjust the settings from the Inspector. Using Fusion at all is overkill for things like that.

I don’t understand you at all. You sculpt everything to the heap. We started for one, and ended up buying a burger. I did not create this topic for reasoning, discussion or assumption, but for My suggestions for improving the DaVinci program. Now this is not a list of suggestions for improving the program, but a typical pointless topic of reasoning.

I don’t understand you at all. You sculpt everything to the heap. We started for one, and ended up buying a burger. I did not create this topic for reasoning, discussion or assumption, but for My suggestions for improving the DaVinci program. Now this is not a list of suggestions for improving the program, but a typical pointless topic of reasoning.

I use the Davinci Resolve, too, and I don't want good software ruined by bad ideas. Read the other topics in this requests forum. It's filled with other people who use Davinci Resolve that also want to improve it and are protective of it. Some people might like a suggestion and they'll back it up. Others will like the feature but they'll disagree on the implementation. Sometimes people will agree on the problem but not that solutions. It's not uncommon for arguments to break out about whether or not a feature is needed or if BMD should spend their time implementing a feature.

There's more to adding features than just... adding features. New features should make sense within the context of the software. If someone suggests an alternative way to do something that Resolve can already do but they don't explain what the benefits are, then people will ask questions. If you don't want discussion in your topic than it isn't a topic. If there is no room for reasoning when it comes to your suggestions than that means your suggestions must be unreasonable. If you don't want me to assume things than you should explain things more so I don't have to fill in gaps of information with assumptions.

In this case, many of your suggestions don't make sense to me.

You want a feature that moves a composition over to the next clip in the Clip view. Why? Fusion is for complex compositions where there's a lot of tight integration between assets. What are you doing in Fusion that has no dependency on the clip below it? If someone's doing a chroma key, camera tracking, and background replacement then none of that would apply to the next clip at all.

You want a feature that lets you do transitions on adjustment layers? Why? Just saying it's "quicker" for you doesn't actually answer the question. What's so unique about the transitions you're using that are so unique that it needs to be an adjustment clips doesn't need to be aware of the incoming and outgoing clip, and can't be done by just extending the abilities of the regular transitions?

You want the ability to save adjustment clips with compositions, markers and cuts added to them Why and how? Aren't you just using the markers as a hacky way to do transitions now? Wouldn't you want a better solution if the adjustment layer transitions actually became a thing? How would you store a cut when cuts are the things that split clips and aren't a feature of a clip?

You want Fusion transitions to have be able to have a maximum length. What point would there be in adding that for a re-usable asset when you could just limit it yourself and then cut and paste the transition?

I use the Davinci Resolve, too, and I don't want good software ruined by bad ideas. Read the other topics in this requests forum.

Your desire does not affect the decision of the developers.

If someone suggests an alternative way to do something that Resolve can already do but they don't explain what the benefits are, then people will ask questions. If you don't want discussion in your topic than it isn't a topic. If there is no room for reasoning when it comes to your suggestions than that means your suggestions must be unreasonable. If you don't want me to assume things than you should explain things more so I don't have to fill in gaps of information with assumptions.

I don’t have to explain anything to anyone. I write for developers, and if at least something interests them, I can add information for Them.

In this case, many of your suggestions don't make sense to me.

They should not make sense to you.

You want a feature that moves a composition over to the next clip in the Clip view. Why? Fusion is for complex compositions where there's a lot of tight integration between assets. What are you doing in Fusion that has no dependency on the clip below it? If someone's doing a chroma key, camera tracking, and background replacement then none of that would apply to the next clip at all.

You want a feature that lets you do transitions on adjustment layers? Why? Just saying it's "quicker" for you doesn't actually answer the question. What's so unique about the transitions you're using that are so unique that it needs to be an adjustment clips doesn't need to be aware of the incoming and outgoing clip, and can't be done by just extending the abilities of the regular transitions?

You want the ability to save adjustment clips with compositions, markers and cuts added to them Why and how? Aren't you just using the markers as a hacky way to do transitions now? Wouldn't you want a better solution if the adjustment layer transitions actually became a thing? How would you store a cut when cuts are the things that split clips and aren't a feature of a clip?

You want Fusion transitions to have be able to have a maximum length. What point would there be in adding that for a re-usable asset when you could just limit it yourself and then cut and paste the transition?

It's "quicker" not for me, for all.
Again, if you ask such questions, then you are clearly far from it. Those who have tried all the options DaVinci knows which is better.

PROBLEM1: Very often when you click on a transition with the right mouse button and select "Open in Fusion Page", the composition is created not of the transition, but of the video below it.

Your desire does not affect the decision of the developers.

The reason why BMD adds features to Resolve is to react to user requests. If one very inexperienced person wants a feature, and a bunch of others are against it, then why would BMD add it. That's why when most people make a make feature requests they dedicate a topic to one detailed request in a structured post and encourage discussion about it. In my own feature requests, if someone brings up a flaw in my request then I try to adjust the suggestion to account for that flaw because I realize that I'm not the only person using that software.

I don’t have to explain anything to anyone. I write for developers, and if at least something interests them, I can add information for Them.

Well then you're in the wrong place. Blackmagic employees will occasionally participate in these forums but these are user forums.

The definition of a forum is "a place, meeting, or medium where ideas and views on a particular issue can be exchanged." and the definition of a topic is "a matter dealt with in a text, discourse, or conversation; a subject." Neither dictates that one person lists their demands and that everyone else should shut up.

They should not make sense to you.

That makes absolutely zero sense. Why shouldn't it make sense to me? I've been using NLEs for 19 years and I'm a programmer. Why shouldn't your supposedly developer-focused requests for a NLE make sense to me?

It's "quicker" not for me, for all.

How so and who are you speaking for? As far as I've seen you're the only person to suggest this and you were the only person posting in this topic for 9 months. Literally nobody else in that time as expressed support for your idea or had trouble with how transitions currently work. This topic has over 1500 views and nobody expressed support for your ideas or even decided to post until I came in saying I didn't understand your requests. Think about that.

Again, if you ask such questions, then you are clearly far from it. . Those who have tried all the options DaVinci knows which is better.

Get off your high horse. You clearly aren't very experienced with Resolve and you seem to just make simple gaming videos. Not shaming the type of videos you make (I have a Lets Play channel as well) but don't act like you have some super specific advanced needs that myself and others can't possibly understand.

And no, I'm not assuming that you're inexperienced. I can read your other topics. You once asked how to get Adjustment Clips to apply to only some clips below it meaning that you started this topic without even knowing how adjustment clips really work. Even in that topic, someone mentioned that you weren't really explaining what you were trying to do which is still the case now. That also seems to be the topic where you determined that you must need Fusion for what you're trying to do even though the only nodes people were referring to were the ones on the color page.

viewtopic.php?f=21&t=97248

In this topic, you didn't seem to grasp how transitions work and you claimed that there would be no purpose in you wasting time learning how the program works when you the program can instead be changed to work for your needs.

viewtopic.php?f=21&t=95531

In this topic you're bringing up some issue and nobody can help you because you're not explaining your issue and just getting argumentative.

viewtopic.php?f=21&t=105379



I'm just asking questions about your suggestions, trying to understand your needs, and bumping your topic in the process. No need to get needlessly defensive. I understand that you don't speak English and that you need to translate everything but refusing to provide details and being dismissive of people isn't helping the communication barrier.

PROBLEM: Very often when you click on a transition with the right mouse button and select "Open in Fusion Page", the composition is created not of the transition, but of the video below it.

This is a request forum. If you think you found a bug then post about it in the Davinci Resolve forum in a different topic and include details. For example, are you talking about a regular transition, Fusion transitions, or your Adjustment Clip transitions?

PROBLEM2: When adding Controls with a Default value that is not 0, the parameter automatically resets the value to the minimum specified, after restarting the program or when duplicating nodes with the Controls created in it.

I really don't know if I'm missing the procedure but I thinking to add a suggestion related to motion graphics and fusion. If we have a way to animate the radius of the circle mask we can make wonders with motions graphics. We could add some masking and the radius animation on top to make count downs, hud displays and things like that with procedural actions only. I am not sure if I make the idea clear but I'll upload a graphic to show it.

I really don't know if I'm missing the procedure but I thinking to add a suggestion related to motion graphics and fusion. If we have a way to animate the radius of the circle mask we can make wonders with motions graphics. We could add some masking and the radius animation on top to make count downs, hud displays and things like that with procedural actions only. I am not sure if I make the idea clear but I'll upload a graphic to show it.

You can already do that.

I really don't know if I'm missing the procedure but I thinking to add a suggestion related to motion graphics and fusion. If we have a way to animate the radius of the circle mask we can make wonders with motions graphics. We could add some masking and the radius animation on top to make count downs, hud displays and things like that with procedural actions only. I am not sure if I make the idea clear but I'll upload a graphic to show it.

You can already do that.

Thank you for your fast response. I do not know why my image didn't show, maybe I'm doing something wrong.

I understand we can already do that but in the animation the size of the gap is fixed and you only rotate the circle to show the movement. What I'm talking about is animating something like the radius so we can make something like a count down. Like you see on some webpages or Hud displays in Sci Fi movies or percentage in the circular infographic animations. and if we thing something like this we can have squared graphics or irregular graphics with circular animations.

I'll try to link the image again

I really don't know if I'm missing the procedure but I thinking to add a suggestion related to motion graphics and fusion. If we have a way to animate the radius of the circle mask we can make wonders with motions graphics. We could add some masking and the radius animation on top to make count downs, hud displays and things like that with procedural actions only. I am not sure if I make the idea clear but I'll upload a graphic to show it.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?&v=64DaE7kifDM

Thank you for the link. I tried to wrap my head around it but wasn't able to figure it out.

I did my homework before posting doing some search on Youtube, but wasn't able to find how to do it.

Thanks again...

All you have to do is keyframe the Length parameter of the Ellipse mask to create what you are describing. I also already created a countdown timer with a circle using what I described.

NEED MAKE: If you press Ctrl + T in Spline, then after restarting the program it is closed again. Make it remember my choice.

Please fix the DVE node. Motion Blur does not work correctly with Frame Render Script.

If you copy the transition using the ALT key, it copies correctly. If you use CTRL + C & CTRL + V, then the Controls are reset by default.