Jim Simon wrote:My preference would be for BMD to focus on professional camera formats, not consumer level web formats.
Both would be perfect. More flexibility would be nice
The next part of my argumentation in this response it's mostly aimed at Blackmagic Magic if they read this post.
If there is a particular "professional" camera formats that Resolve needs to be able to read, people should ask for it.
If you think about it, you have to admit something, there is no such of things of a "professional" camera format. There are "professionals" (people, companies, etc.) who are making a living of developing codecs, editing videos, etc., that decided to agree on particular workflows with particular formats in certain contexts.
In this kind of context, everything can be a "professional" format. For me it's a very subjective concept.
Besides that, what Resolve can read shouldn't matter. Resolve SHOULD be able to read everything video/audio wise imo. What's really important is what people can produce with the software.
The source shouldn't matter. There are so many situations were "pros" certainly would love to just drop the files they have without having to convert them (taking more space, more time). We shouldn't stop at these words, "youtube", "web", etc. almost everything is online now and we should be able to work with these formats.
Supporting more formats at the "ingestion" stage doesn't take anything away from "pros"
The FLAC format is read properly by Resolve, but not Vorbis. Another example that doesn't makes sense for me (from an outsider perspective). At one point many, many years ago (I don't know now), FLAC and Vorbis (.flac - .ogg) were "paired" naturally by people who liked good quality audio files. FLAC, lossless compression, way smaller than a WAVE file ripped from CDs, and Ogg Vorbis, its "natural" compressed counter part, WAY better than MP3.
And now with DVR 17, I can play video encoded in VP9 (it did weird things with 16)... so not supporting other "web" format (meaning mostly used by "web services") doesn't make sense. Like Opus, the new "Vorbis", or the container WebM.
"Opus replaces both Vorbis and Speex for new applications, and several blind listening tests have ranked it higher quality than any other standard audio format at any given bitrate until transparency is reached, including MP3, AAC, and HE-AAC"For WebM :
"WebM is an audiovisual media file format.[4] It is primarily intended to offer a royalty-free alternative to use in the HTML5 video and the HTML5 audio elements. It has a sister project WebP for images. The development of the format is sponsored by Google, and the corresponding software is distributed under a BSD license.
The WebM container is based on a profile of Matroska.[3][5][6] WebM initially supported VP8 video and Vorbis audio streams. In 2013, it was updated to accommodate VP9 video and Opus audio.[7]"They talk about Matroska (MKV) too. WebM is natively supported by most browsers, and optimized for that. Most content is consumed online now. "Pros" are consumers too
All of this to say, I can understand Blackmagic wanting to be more restrictive with the formats proposed at the delivery stage, but at the ingestion stage, it makes no sense to not include the ones that are used by millions.
So BMD please, add more supported codecs/containers, like WebM/MKV/Vorbis/Opus.