Jim Simon wrote:Maxwellx wrote:Options are just that, OPTIONS!!
Yes but...a program can't include
all options. There just aren't enough resources.
Additionally, every new features brings with it the possibility of bugs, which also take resources to handle.
Let the developers and people at Blackmagic decide for themselves (they already do, but you get the point). Please, stop with this. You're not the only one talking about "resources", but nobody except THEM are deciding if they want to invest time and money into something.
They only look at if the proposed features are interesting, possible to integrate, and if many people are for it (I just base this on common sense and logic). I'm sure they look at the ones who give GOOD counterarguments too, but those with logical and detailed examples against a feature.
I'm pretty sure they are not like : Oh, that's good that someone told us not to waste resources, we were ready to integrate this feature... pfffffiu! lol
And you know damn well they included TONS of features you were "against" over the years
So this "angle" of denying people's feature request only makes people who read you mad you and doesn't help anyone.
I don't know how you can't understand that. Like I said many times, if you have LEGIT reasons why a feature wouldn't be good in Resolve, describe it properly. If not, please don't post things as if you had any thing to say about how Blackmagic do their work.
Is it hard to not do that?