- Posts: 13
- Joined: Fri Dec 04, 2020 7:39 pm
- Real Name: Dave Roberts
Hi Guys,
My first post...
We installed a BMD ATEM Television Studio Pro HD at our Church a few months ago. Nice piece of kit...
We have had some fun and games getting cameras to work with it at 1080p50 though - and have had to return three types so far I think.
Anyhow - they were all camera problems not 'fully' compatible with the Specifications...
We have now installed 4 off Cisco/Tandberg TelePresence PrecsionHD 1080p12X Cameras (TTC8-02) hooked up via BMD HDMI to SDI converters to the ATEM and the visual side of things is absolutely brilliant. The first 'full' test drive was today! I had one of these cameras given to me a while ago and that made my mind up (after a few abortive attempts) to get some more compatible Cisco units!
No problem with hooking up the ATEM with the RS422 VISCA port either. I made my own RS422/RS232 converter box and (after a bit of fighting with the TX/RX wiring to/from the ATEM) got everything to work. The cameras are all hooked up in a daisy-chain.
Now to my issues:
1. After a power cycle, the ATEM still thinks there are four (4) cameras connected - but can only control the first one. Rescanning the VISCA chain and all is well again. I suspect this is down to the cameras 'forgetting' the daisy-chain arrangement and not the ATEM though (so this is a problem for me to post on the Cisco forum).
2. The Pan/Tilt from the ATEM (via the in-built trackball) is incredibly 'lumpy'. Zoom is smooth though. I see there are a number of threads here stating that PT/VISCA control via the trackball is poor - but they do not state why and what the symptoms are. Is this 'lumpiness' a symptom of the ATEM? After a few attempts of 'playing' with the trackball I can generally get the camera to point where I want it to point...
I have also noted some disparity between the ATEM VISCA protocol manual and the Cisco equivalent for the camera - but I believe the Cisco documents are in error (as someone has posted a wireshark dump of some of the PTZ packets and they don't conform to the Cisco-stated protocol either). I believe, therefore, that the two PTZ protocols are compatible (but I will check in a short while with wireshark for my own peace of mind).
Any help gratefully received.
Regards,
Dave
My first post...
We installed a BMD ATEM Television Studio Pro HD at our Church a few months ago. Nice piece of kit...
We have had some fun and games getting cameras to work with it at 1080p50 though - and have had to return three types so far I think.
Anyhow - they were all camera problems not 'fully' compatible with the Specifications...
We have now installed 4 off Cisco/Tandberg TelePresence PrecsionHD 1080p12X Cameras (TTC8-02) hooked up via BMD HDMI to SDI converters to the ATEM and the visual side of things is absolutely brilliant. The first 'full' test drive was today! I had one of these cameras given to me a while ago and that made my mind up (after a few abortive attempts) to get some more compatible Cisco units!
No problem with hooking up the ATEM with the RS422 VISCA port either. I made my own RS422/RS232 converter box and (after a bit of fighting with the TX/RX wiring to/from the ATEM) got everything to work. The cameras are all hooked up in a daisy-chain.
Now to my issues:
1. After a power cycle, the ATEM still thinks there are four (4) cameras connected - but can only control the first one. Rescanning the VISCA chain and all is well again. I suspect this is down to the cameras 'forgetting' the daisy-chain arrangement and not the ATEM though (so this is a problem for me to post on the Cisco forum).
2. The Pan/Tilt from the ATEM (via the in-built trackball) is incredibly 'lumpy'. Zoom is smooth though. I see there are a number of threads here stating that PT/VISCA control via the trackball is poor - but they do not state why and what the symptoms are. Is this 'lumpiness' a symptom of the ATEM? After a few attempts of 'playing' with the trackball I can generally get the camera to point where I want it to point...
I have also noted some disparity between the ATEM VISCA protocol manual and the Cisco equivalent for the camera - but I believe the Cisco documents are in error (as someone has posted a wireshark dump of some of the PTZ packets and they don't conform to the Cisco-stated protocol either). I believe, therefore, that the two PTZ protocols are compatible (but I will check in a short while with wireshark for my own peace of mind).
Any help gratefully received.
Regards,
Dave