As someone who has a Pocket 4K, I think it’s interesting that people are talking about how much useful remaining life there is in a camera that’s been in production for all of 6 years. My desert island camera is a Leica M3 that was made in 1956. It’s easily the best-handling camera that I’ve owned, a pleasure to use. Runner-up is an Arca-Swiss 8x10* that was made in 1995 and that’s still in production today. I can make an 8x10 print the same size as the “sensor” with a couple of sheets of glass and a 7W light bulb. Seeing an 8x10 “contact print” is a revelation. From that perspective, the recent theft by cinema camera makers of the term “large format” is pretty amusing

That said, the discussion reflects the reality. The position of the market, which is to say camera buyers, on the useful life of current cameras makes debating which of two cameras is “better” a pretty short term game. It’s also clear, from publicly available data, who’s winning the game, and it isn’t the makers of conventional cameras. They’ve already been relegated to niche market share. I suspect that the main question now is what happens with “artificial intelligence”.
* Phillipe Vogt was making cameras before he was making tripod heads, and he and his son still make cameras in Besançon, France. Vogt likes to keep a low profile. His U.S. distributor launched the first ever Arca-Swiss website only last summer
