Taikonaut wrote:Ryan Best wrote:As important as it was for this update to be made, it is just as vital that we have some information regarding the BMCC if the sensor issue no longer becomes an issue.
What do you think would be the issue surrounding the delay of the BMC camera handle? They didnt bother shipping that out so what chance have they got for the camera itself?
I fear the only reason for this is BMD is biting off more than they could chew. It is too small a company. Not only do they have no previous experience in building a camera prior to the BMC they have no experience in mass production. It is not hard to imagine why companies gets their stuff made in China these days.
I appreciate that you, like myself are very frustrated about the delays surrounding the BMCC, but I will not begin to speculate on what may or may not be happening behind the scenes. POINTLESS.
What I will say is that Grant has outlined the issue, whether true or false, whatever way you view it - there are some of us that wish to believe that this is the story and that BMD want us all to have this great product.
Now Taking into consideration all the delays and unfortunately the poor communication shown on this matter - I am inclined to believe that if the sensor issue had not arisen, we would all have - or be much closer to owning a BMCC.
I believe Grant has honestly tried to give us the best update he could at this moment in time - BUT there are some details regarding pre-orders being fulfilled (as explained in my previous post) that could have been included. I believe this would have had a positive impact on the relations not only between BMD and their customers, but also between customers and their respective resellers.