- Posts: 291
- Joined: Fri Jan 23, 2015 10:08 pm
michael vorberg wrote:Abdelrahman Magdy wrote:This is what he said:It kind of still is. I mean, there might be something in there, I think the network rendering is something that people might want.
rings more alarm bells then before for me! sounds like he didnt understand Fusion as a product at all, how its used, how versatile it is,how different workflow can be
when he talks about how nice the new UI design is... wth? who cares about the node design if i cant do work like i need to
I understand what you are saying. This is why I said it is a bit reassuring for the time being. Because, to me, he seemed a bit unsure about it .
Let's hope for a better clarification soon. It would be a huge loss if they kill it completely. There are a lot of things that we will lose with it, from the most simple to the most advanced. Even the whole UI thing that Grant talks about, for me, the UI of Resolve's Fusion looks a bit cluttered to me. The flow feels too small compared to what we are used to in Fusion. When it comes to the more advanced staff, I, honestly, can't talk a lot, as I am far from claiming to be the experienced Fusion as other people in these forums can do.
System specs:
Resolve Studio version: 16.1.0.055
Fusion Studio version: 9.0.2
OS: CentOS 7
CPU: Intel i7-4790k 4GHz Quad-Core
RAM: 32GB
GPU: NVIDIA GeForce 1080 Ti 11GB
Resolve Studio version: 16.1.0.055
Fusion Studio version: 9.0.2
OS: CentOS 7
CPU: Intel i7-4790k 4GHz Quad-Core
RAM: 32GB
GPU: NVIDIA GeForce 1080 Ti 11GB