Hendrik Proosa wrote:If you have a choice between higher freq lower core count and lower freq higher core count and freq x numCores and other specifics are equal for both, first option is faster in all softwares due to benefits in single-threaded ops which are unavoidably there, whatever the processing method is. There are cpus where a few cores can run at higher speeds than the rest though, to aid the single-threaded speedup, so it might not be as clear cut, but general principle applies.
Carsten Sellberg wrote: In Resolve the CPU is used to run the app, disk I/O, fusion, compression and decompression of codecs. Resolve does all its image processing in the GPU on the graphics card. More CUDA/OpenCL Cores are better. In the paid STUDIO Version of Resolve, can certain combination of Codec, Resolutions, Bit width and Chroma subsampling be hardware decoded/encoded on either a AMD/nVidea Graphics card or in a Intel non Xeon CPU. Then you can use a little less powerfull CPU.
So if you only are using the Studio version of Resolve, and only certain combination of Codec, Resolutions, Bit width and Chroma subsampling will Resolve NOT use the CPU for decoding/encoding of codecs. Else will a CPU with higher multi core performance do the decoding/encoding faster.
Regards Carsten.
Thanks. I'd be interested in your comments on my proposed build.
I have the Studio version of Resolve.
Most of my heavy tasks are 2D Fusion compositions made up of sometimes many dozens of keyframed shapes for explainer animations. In video, it is entirely H.264 8bit 4:2:0. Studio lighting, hence, basic color correction, and no color grading, other than some masking.
Hence:
-
CPU: 11900K i9 - because Puget Systems said this was the
best Fusion performer, even though this CPU was not best in other categories.
-
CPU: Intel, above - instead of Ryzen 5900X, because the Intel has Quick Sync for H.264 8 bit 4:2:0 encoding decoding, whereas the 5900X does not have h.264 coding. Also, because Intel motherboards in mini ITX offer 128GB, whereas Ryzen AM4 motherboards for mITX top out at 64GB. (I'd like to use mini mITX).
-
GPU: Probably 3070 since, from the Puget benchmarks for Fusion, it doesn't look like going to 3080 makes that much difference between 3070 and 3080. Indeed, one user reported on Reddit that he didn't see much difference between 3060TI to 3080
in respect of Fusion performance. His experience agrees with the Puget benchmarks which show virtually no Fusion difference for 3060, 3080, 3090.
-
RAM: 128GB - not sure if this is overkill for the 2D effects, but sometimes my compositions can have a couple of hundred nodes.
I'd be interested in your comments on my proposed build - although it is rather academic at this stage, since I can't find a 3070 or 3080 at a reasonable price. Still using my Apple M1 16GB.
https://www.pugetsystems.com/labs/articles/DaVinci-Resolve-Studio-11th-Gen-Intel-Core-vs-AMD-Ryzen-5000-Series-2104/https://www.pugetsystems.com/labs/articles/DaVinci-Resolve-Studio---NVIDIA-GeForce-RTX-3070-3080-3090-Performance-1950/