Sun Mar 10, 2019 4:50 am
You know, I could hardly believe the paranoia of doctors about telling patients things and them deludedly reacting, because its not my a+bxc=(a+b)c experience. But its true, some people just go nuts. So ts worth being open to possibilities not in our experience.
Actually, just to show you how nuts things get. There was a bank robber (in the States) who covered his face with lemon juice in the belief it would make him invisible, because lemon juice could be used as invisible ink. It pays to not just believe what you think or heard. These sorts of things spread through society to people apparently rational due to limited self rationalisation, where in reality, the more you know in general the more you realise you don't know everything. I know one guy gobbing up heaps of conspiracy theories, and another guy who nationally distributes more tame conspiracy stuff. They are often deterministic people, who respond to deterministic/assertive thought, so rationalise on deterministic/assertive thought, having discriminatory hierarchical preference systems for who they listen to rather than what kind of rationalisation they listen to. Very creepy, but very documentary worthy. Their power preference leads them to preference authority and their own authority rather than preferencing primary figuring out (hence, based on what they believe they mis-figure out things). In reality, even some things are often a real rabbit warren of complexity in understanding it). That if you really know what you are doing you use a lot of if, but, maybe, could be etc, conditional language, none deterministic non assertive, because you know things are more complex and you are only illustrating a slice of a perspective on it. Short replies are often nothing much and or mistaken. So, conditional explanation drives hardline deterministic fanatics around the bend reading it because its an actual explanation rather than a convenient naive assertion. When such people are in control the nation shrinks at the same time as believing they are powerful. An example of a powerful leader who is considered, would be Putin. He probably has conditional advisors. This is not to say that is the case for others there.
aIf you are not truthfully progressive, maybe you shouldn't say anything
bTruthful side topics in-line with or related to, the discussion accepted
cOften people deceive themselves so much they do not understand, even when the truth is explained to them