- Posts: 3362
- Joined: Thu Aug 01, 2013 3:58 am
- Location: Earth
joe12south wrote:Wayne Steven wrote:That's one quarter what the human eye can discern by scientific testing.
I was going say ahhg, my head feels like exploring, not another one of these threads before.
Carry on. I'm just fortunate to avoid this one.
Resolving power absent size and viewing distance is impossible to quantity. It's meaningless. Nobody can see 1080P or 4K or any arbitrary resolution. We can revolve a certain number of pixels per inch, which is, of course, relative to size vs distance. My eye's resolve a 40ppi billboard across the street and a 244ppi phone in my hand at roughly the same level of detail.
Using semantics to prove misinformation Joe? Does the tree really fall if their is no one in the forest to hear it. At least me and Bart Simpson know his to clap with one hand. Noo, stop trying to suck me back in Joe!
Of course you know I am only referring 8k display at a good field of view where it matches the (presumably) emissive display resolution reduction of the human eye, when which is a very good field of view. I've been studying product design related technologies for over three decades. Its still resolution, even 'dots per inch'. But surprisingly difficult to find proper definitions on line in the past, so I had to do my own experiments.
aIf you are not truthfully progressive, maybe you shouldn't say anything
bTruthful side topics in-line with or related to, the discussion accepted
cOften people deceive themselves so much they do not understand, even when the truth is explained to them
bTruthful side topics in-line with or related to, the discussion accepted
cOften people deceive themselves so much they do not understand, even when the truth is explained to them