John Brawley wrote:
Yeah....
Irrelevant rant deleted.
Let's rain on this pollution too. Nice refreshing rain.
Yes, he has a history having a go at a man that has a brain disease that causes him not to remember details (actually not the only brain disease). Smokey here, need more water. Yes, they are lazy. They repeatedly expect you to spend hours looking up information from years ago, even the same information, and according to Arron, won't even except evidence contrary to what they WANT (get the idea), pestering instead. Wasting somebody else's life for a neurotic joy ride torturing a sick man to do it. Wow the pollution is bad.
Ok, the next comes under jealously. Not taking the hint or evidence that they are wrong they won't even accept truthful statements about origins of ideas. I don't think I've ever called my self a genius here but others smarter than anybody else here have. So John's opinion doesn't matter, he resorts to various tactics because he has been wrong. I don't know if he has ever once apologised for wasting many hours of my time from time to time (that ignore button is a relief, for me. I want them to give me an block button so certain people (to be polite) can't see my posts. One feature I can't get implemented. I'm just the messenger, don't go shooting reality.
John, Rants, about one occasion I'm wrong, which I appologised for, and conflates that in trumpian statement to all other occasions. 'Oh, that Wayne, he was wrong about one thing, he must be wrong about everything. I should know, I'm right about so many things'. See, how the two sound so similar. He has no proof I'm majority wrong, but even often, but repeatedly the opposite seems the case.
So, the situation is a handful of less than 0.1 of a percent, come along and try to grind my time with their forced "dance"s in their fantasies that THEY must be right, because they are basing things on the hear say of the industry rather than researching things and thinking about what is being said. I've often had them talking nonsense about things I'm not even talking about, as if they are actually talking about what I was talking about, the subject at hand. Trying to force the argument off the rails, in order to Win over, in effect, truth. No appologies from them, and they will rant all week in strange ways. Hmm, sounds like Pollution, again. My time is important, and now you have wasted enough if it.
He dwells on internally felt points, which are again inaccurate, except being regarded as ignorant part, but just when they earn it. Where as with evil people you have to earn respect, with some others you have to earn disrespect, and you may be giving way more respect then deserved for way longer than needed. Now, with my life being wasted by them, I just give up and cut to the chase. We are all ignorant, that's part of humbleness. Realising your ignorance (writing on tip of iceberg) opens you up to learning, and accepting the actual truth explained to you, and exploring the iceberg. I get national socialists try these very same tactics as the handful do here. I can explain to them, basically, that reality is a lot different than they imagine. Do you think it reasonable that I just gobbled up whatever you say, yes sir, no sir, such people are in a fantasy bubble. They sprook half baked ideas, fantasies and partly baked truths, with no real idea of the technical truth.
Wow, he really goes off here. I apologise, and he accuses me of not appologising. I make a useful contribution and he accuses me of not making a useful contribution. In the dealings I've had he doesn't usually appologise (if at all) or make an useful contribution, just wasting. The situation I Have Suffered, has been bad. Objecting to right statements is not constructive, but disruptive and derailing, which is what they have been doing a lot of. The handful, in mis-catergorised logic, has loved to do that. The problem isn't really me! People function in various ways, and it gets a bit complicated, they stick to feelings of truth rather than truth. Every little micro rant (and often that's what they are dressed up) requires a lengthy sophisticated answer to address points.
I looked up how things were being discussed when Captain pointed out what was happening, which I often do to verify facts and what the right line of argument is before replying. Many people who make issue, don't seem to, and dynamically derail the argument in real time. This time, I had forgotten the original sub-argument, and it was me who did it. So, a taste of your own medicine for a change, except I stuck to what I thought the argument was in a correct way. Anyway I'm nodding off to sleep here, so I have to finish up (took a sleeper hours ago).
The summary there is disturbing. No recognition of useful contribution. From somebody who is intent of dissrupting contribution and calling right wrong, basically noise. From somebody who is one of a handful who makes it difficult to have a REAL useful conversation, in order to make himself feel better, while in reality being "usually wrong or at best, way off topic" at hand. I have had a number of discussions with only certain people who constantly conflate the subtopic at hand as being something else and distort things, as I have mentioned above. To such people their error is the only truth that was, and is, being discussed by the other person, instead of what is actually being discussed, some sort of trumpian fantasy untruth, even though the actual subject and truth was very different. You can't win. These people mis-catergorise all sorts of stuff actively, listening to their look up table rather than accessing what is actually said. I'm not the problem.
(Re-edit: tidied up the odd grammar mistake, and a handful of little things. Boy these people).