I don't remember if I posted here, have looked at it on occasion. But Roland's, yes an update. It occurs to me that Braw could do significantly more towards the Arrri, Or mini 4.6k or Braw, as pre baked looks with deeper durability in the image. A real prp feature, is to expand Braw the emulate other cameras, or looks being used in filming. There is a section of work which has standard looks and handover. Imagine mixing mini footage with other eng cameras. If there is less differences. There is less post work quicker handoff to broadcast and live intermix feeds. Then it is a matter of providing the functionality, ease of handling and low cost reliability and durability, then what reason is there not to buy Braw instead of other ENG cameras. If BM is doing all this mapping, they can map all these cameras, and assign an numerical number for each look (to avoid TM). Imagine a Eng camera with advanced Arri look in Sony sensor. As well as enhanced Sony r g look on 4.6k. And a paid online looks market for download into Braw and resolve, direct to camera wirelessly as well as via phone or desktop,ballieung you try a recommendation onnthe spot.
![:-) :)](./images/smilies/icon_e_smile.gif)
. You talk about Arrii or Sony reliability, but what is going be BM:s advanced ability to see?
So, as I posted in one of Dimitry's threads, and as one of the engineers now says, you can get a few extra stops out of the pocket by using highlights (but expose to maximize the trick) and advance temporal noise removing out of the lower stops, and remap for look. You then get some usability bringing it towards the 4.6k, Alexa and old Red, the 4.6k less stop due to less room in the noise profile. So, yes, bring it in, still a lot left to archieve, apart from the areas I've suggested in the past. I was waiting to get a certain cameras to demonstrate this, but seems I've got a, cough, micro of a 6k-8k chance here of seeing that soon. I've had these mechanisms running through my head for a long time, but often forget these things due to the medical issue. The fact is that you colour filter can act like a ND filter does on certain Sony chips, for better highlights and pushing more stops into the central region of the images levels, for nicer toning. It's not an actual sensor Nd filter pattern, so it is not always going to work, and you can bake in some mistakes. But, wow, the possibility to time like we see it! Cone on BM, you are so close. Several changes to Braw will bring it so much closer to Alexa fir a fraction of the inconvenience. So good tracking temporal noise removal as an option on the camera is something. It means that footage on 4.6k will be more usable a stop or two darker, and more if you ussually only want to useca very clean image, but don't do a deep clean on post. I'm taking about tracking quality noise removal, as I had been secretly been talking about for decades, while others acted like they thought they knew everything. I've been thinking of advanced imaging deconstruction techniques since the early to mid 1980's you are still waiting to see from the market. Lost of money wasted in the wrong areas. It's easy to be confident when you put the actual work in to figuring the details out of how to do everything for a long time.
Now. Imagine what future Braw updates might archieve on your mini 4.6k!