Well, it looks like I was replying to multiple people. My apologies. As each has fallen silent I guess they got what I was talking about.
Now, Wow, you jumped the gun.
Yes you can craft such a feature on certain software, and I never suggested they stay with the current system, though they can request a feature request.
The admins don't agree, can you point me to your proof of that? If you mean they they don't really, which is ussual, it could even mean they do agree. We just don't know. I ussually never get feedback on feature requests, they just turn up a normal development cycle latter.
You might as well agree, people being civilised trying to wade in the pool, contrasts well to the uninvited local yobo screamingly trying to dive bomb in the middle of them. If they feel inadequate, they can be humble and learn. The intellect discussion part on any thread is self evident, it's normalcy rather then averagism, a reality.
Think, certain people, are the people in the thread, not anybody off forum
on Google, like a public street..eh. if you are going to bust somebodies chops, then pick something worth doing it for.
Like the funny people stuff, they have repeatedly continuously shown the same behaviour.
You're quoting Reagan as proof? Good Governments are meant to be supportive to a better life, otherwise they wouldn't lock up people who are wrecking life (though many don't seem to be doing a good job of that in certain places, and I do think lives matter). But, yes, world wide moderation standards back by law, are the absolute first thing we want. The wild west movie version of the internet has to go. The intellectual and hippy versions, were better. Professionals, often the lowest form of intellect, but considering themselves the highest, was not great!! (You notice as much as I try to learn. I hardly ever use ! marks).
landyvlad wrote:Wow..
...
If what someone else posts is consistent with forum rules - that's all that matters.
If you get offended.. so what? You have a right to get offended but can't expect the world to revolve around you. The best way to deal with people on a forum you are offended by is not to argue with them, but to disengage and ignore them. And that's exactly what the ignore feature is for.
I could make a valid comparison here, but I'd be facilitating Godwin's Law
Again, you are offended, and it's revolving around YOUR opinions, rather than what is right. You get the contrast? You are largerly wrong, coming from the world west net mentality. They come they harrass, they argue, all the time, and bsjwsts the same people. The moderators on all types of forums just let them go, and on many forums are not that great, but here is different though. The moderators on those forums often act in ways that should be in court but a little bit of law instead of civil and rights bssed criminal actions, is preferable. So reverse block is the way to keep the crazies out if your hair in such a wild west world.
Now. you have not been making much valid comparisons here Michael, so why bother?
Well, at least that wasn't like what ussually happens, they repeatedly come back and argue to try to look right when proven wrong (often over stuff they continually interpreted wrong in the first place to argue about, the funny handicapped part).