Tue Jul 28, 2020 9:49 am
Well, I wouldn't mind 8k s35 nearly 11k fullframe over 23k 15 perf. Something like that, as I'm not buying the mini, it's not so small. If it was is the production mini at the same price, maybe. Once you go above property prosumer camcorder size, a just gets a bit big to handle all the time with my sicknesses. Even the pocket is too big, especially considering putting decent lenses on it. But, I challenge BM to do a smaller mini cinema camera with fixed lens prosumer camcorder format and video production features, 8k-16k (depending on sensor size) with semi permanent semi fixed 12 or 20x optical zoom, with B4 2/3rds sensor windowed mount adaptor, as the new production mini. Combine three models into one. With my previous design proposal from years back, you have the sensor mount module on the end rotatable to the side to do pocket format. But, if they could do a full frame with replaceable mounts, then they only need three cameras based on size.
So, let's break this down a pocket sized mini 16k, a s35 12k smaller pocket and a smaller 8k micro, all with swappable smaller lens mounts. The swapable lens mounts designed so they can be locked to the lens and attached to the swapable lens mount when needed, the swappable mount system becomes the new mount. They also can the sell several lens mount adaptors for each user at $100-$200AU a pop (if you are poor, you, just use the one that comes with the camera and maybe by another adaptor. If you are doing ok and have 20 lenses you buy 20adaptors). If they do the swappable lens mount as a proper lens mount, as a variable lens mount, as well know enough now about mounts to design a finale mount for decades to come, with proper but simple to design for electronic control lines, and a heap in reserve for what we don't know (when you come to use them, you extend the patent on that aspect). Once manufacturers start making lens to fit the mount adaptor mount instead, acceptance towards becoming an industry standard can take off. You patent and earn licensing off of cheap licensed, and not cheap per hour approval processes, maybe refundable against 50% licensing fees until paid off, so little manufacturers can easily support. Any unlicensed new product you can sieze, and then if law allows, have a spin off that resells them converting the license to an official license. Of course, importers and manufacturers would rather just pay the license rather than letting this happen. You design your standard to be freely ussable after 20 years by contract, but only if it's designed within spec, which you still approve until you give that up, which terminates that right under the standard, no transfers of business entity unless legitimately court forced in the original legal jurisdiction, otherwise it is declared given up.
No transfers of legal jurisdiction unless contastrophy or pemanment national take over of the countty is forced, and verified in court, otherwise right is given up. Under the standard licensing, only you have the right to extend or change the standard (to be sort to be independently enforced by courts on non licensees as part of reasonable behaviour towards a new standard. Seeking a precedent case, based on the principle of reasonableness on respect to practical functional form, of a standard in this case. This is a new legal proposal by me) and any extension lasts for another independent 20 years of licensing. So, approval of new updated extensions and changes, extended licensing for 20 years only of such. Now, physically the new mount would be bigger than IMAX 15 perf, which with allows multi lens 3D systems to easily fit in the mount, like those Panasonic twin lens 3D lenses, which reserved one side of the sensor per lens, so 1/4 per lens in a 4 lens system (and so on fractions per for different lens numbers). But, also smaller versions of the mount to fit on devices too small for that mount. Next step down would be larger than so called stills full frame or Vista, the next down larger than 24mm. Possibly one larger than a 2/3rds sensor. This would cover everything including a nano action pov camera, and as an alternative to B4. A variable fit version of larger version of the mount is possible, but might only be for light lenses. Most mounts should be the second biggest, as it will fit most pro equipment and the smallest, for common pov action drone use. This is the sort of stuff I would come up with in one sitting a lot of times. I'm writing this new and from past experience this time. Also, making law is not like a few good men, it requires balance and adequacy of the law in consideration of justice fairness and practicality etc. I once had a friend who wanted to be a lawyer after watching a few good men, did a big career in a technical sector, but when he had to go to court, he got his nice suit on and purple tie (maybe that was the suit). Another friend had a landmark court case, and the judge took well over a year to produce a ruling the legal fraternity could not believe. It requires much skill, and I wonder if there should be a board of law technical assistants to advise judges when figuring out alternative law (just the alternative ways of doing stuff, not the actual decision. That's the Judge's place).
aIf you are not truthfully progressive, maybe you shouldn't say anything
bTruthful side topics in-line with or related to, the discussion accepted
cOften people deceive themselves so much they do not understand, even when the truth is explained to them