Paul Jonathan wrote:Hey Mark,
thanks for the footage - super helpful to see some 4k Q5 footage even with the Vimeo compression. In your own impression how do you feel it compares to higher resolution and/or higher quality? Care to comment on low-light capabilities from your experience?
Really would like to see this camera pushed to some noisy underexposure and then see how much the new CFA and extra resolution helps to get that noise floor down when rendering to a 2k or 4k final deliverable.
- Thanks Paul. The 4k is some of the best looking 4k I have seen. Obviously, when you jump up to 8k and 12k there is a clear difference. It is just very nice to have all these options and to use the entire sensor at all three settings. Low light seems great. I think it performs better than the G2.
jallen0 wrote:I said on FB that the details in the shadows with this clip was amazing...even with the Vimeo compression added.
- Thanks. Yes, I agree the shadow detail is outstanding.
Wayne Steven wrote:Mark Wyatt wrote:Here are a few UMP 12k clips. These were shot at 4k Q5, as I wanted to see how the lower resolution and higher compression settings would look. The colour, detail and dynamic range from this sensor is incredible. Vimeo seems to kill the quality though. Clips were graded quickly with Extended Video (with some minor tweaks)
Not that great of dynamic range, where is the cloud detail in the sky, under the trees the outside world is pastel. Not a great sign.
If Vimeo is killing it, what about some stills of difficult scenes, like the cloudy sky, the one where the outside forest can be seen hazily and the front of guys fingers as he examines the water?
Extended video shouldn't look like this. It looks like Sony sensor footage fixed up, where they fail in colour density in the bright areas and clip. It's OK, better than what you normally get from cameras with Sony sensors, which is an objectivity good look. If only it was dual gain, those washed out parts could pop. The in range colour here looks more sparse, where in the Alexa it would look more dense. You could say that one is too sparse and the other too dense, but both are objectively suitable looks with people prefering one or the other depending.
Thanks for the footage.
- I guess we are seeing different things, but that's ok. The weather was not bright clear sky (sort of a high thin haze), that is why the sky looks a bit off (not bright blue). Despite that, shooting in these types of conditions (in the forest, middle of summer at noon) is a great stress test for dynamic range, and this sensor performed incredibly.
- Thanks Note!
Oyvind Fiksdal wrote:Thanks for sharing. The lighting in forest scenes like this can be brutal, high contrast scene. Did you use any kind of reflector on the subjects or was it a run N gun kind of shot?
Looking at the ungraded footage. Seem like you keep both shadows and highlights.
- Thanks Oyvind. Yes, this type of scene is usually very hard to capture, but the camera did great and no details in any of these shots were clipped. This was all very quick (no bounce or reflectors).