John Griffin wrote:I can't go back to 1440 27" screens as the pixels are too noticeable at viewing distances. Maybe there are reasons for the color being better but the image just looks too digital compared to a 4k screen of the same size. YMMV
I was particularly interested in what Foto Care had to say. In business for 50 years, with a working relationship with some of the most important photographers in the U.S., and the dealer that I purchase cameras from, Foto Care is particularly strong on still photography.
The fellow that I dealt with thinks that 3840x2160 is the way to go even for stills. That view somewhat surprised me. As an Eizo dealer, his view is that there is no meaningful difference in quality of colour, for my needs, between a CS series monitor and a CG series. The CS2740 has presets for Adobe sRGB and Adobe RGB, but it's possible to fine-tune these presets for Rec.709 and P3 if one thinks that's necessary.
As mentioned earlier, I have an older ColorEdge Eizo, 24" 1920x1080, with internal calibration. In other words, in its day top of the line. It still works beautifully, but I have it 3000km/1900 miles away, in another country, and it's not for video. The CS2740 is similar in build quality and layout. It isn't pretty. On the other hand, some months ago I purchased a very sleek, quite expensive, Asus 32" ProArt monitor, glowingly reviewed on the internet, that I wound up returning due to a number of problems before even getting to build quality.
This September 2020 Webinar is worth watching for info on what to look for in a monitor and using one for colour work. The presenter woks for Eizo, but most of what he says is not brand dependent. It's a pretty informative presentation:
Cheers