When I first started working with Resolve, the database approach really caught me off guard. I, as many others, are used to working with a project file that lives on your drive with the other content files used for the project.
I soon adapted and went along my way working with the DB approach. That is until recently.
I have a client project DB that had all the projects i work on for them. Some of those projects are completed and I went to archive then to 'clean up' house. I exported a drp and moved that with the content to my clients archive drive. Then I deleted the project from the DB.
Some sync software I use automatically deleted the drp file from the archive drive (totally my fault for missing that config) and since I deleted it from the DB, there no way for me to recover the project file.
Yes I have backups but the backup is of the DB file which the project is already removed from. I have a recycling bin setup on my NAS so if any files are deleted they sit there for about 30 days before they are gone. Since the project was deleted from within the DB file, that bypasses the recycling bin safety.
By moving to project files, standard backup and versioning solutions can be used to avoid situations like I now find myself in.
I understand that there will be those that prefer the DB approach especially those that work in groups with multiple people in one project. I feel that there should be a choice to work with a flat file method or to start a DB project. Of all software I've used, or still use, Resolve is the only one that has used this approach to project management. If it was a better approach why don't we see this used in other software?
Please don't flame me with "you just don't know what you are doing" or saying this request is stupid and I should just get with the times. This is my opinion and I don't think I'm the only one. If you disagree simply say so or better yet don't post anything. Ignore this and move along. I don't feel like getting into forum fights over opinions and you're not going to change my mind to your way of thinking.
Anyone else feel as I do?
I soon adapted and went along my way working with the DB approach. That is until recently.
I have a client project DB that had all the projects i work on for them. Some of those projects are completed and I went to archive then to 'clean up' house. I exported a drp and moved that with the content to my clients archive drive. Then I deleted the project from the DB.
Some sync software I use automatically deleted the drp file from the archive drive (totally my fault for missing that config) and since I deleted it from the DB, there no way for me to recover the project file.
Yes I have backups but the backup is of the DB file which the project is already removed from. I have a recycling bin setup on my NAS so if any files are deleted they sit there for about 30 days before they are gone. Since the project was deleted from within the DB file, that bypasses the recycling bin safety.
By moving to project files, standard backup and versioning solutions can be used to avoid situations like I now find myself in.
I understand that there will be those that prefer the DB approach especially those that work in groups with multiple people in one project. I feel that there should be a choice to work with a flat file method or to start a DB project. Of all software I've used, or still use, Resolve is the only one that has used this approach to project management. If it was a better approach why don't we see this used in other software?
Please don't flame me with "you just don't know what you are doing" or saying this request is stupid and I should just get with the times. This is my opinion and I don't think I'm the only one. If you disagree simply say so or better yet don't post anything. Ignore this and move along. I don't feel like getting into forum fights over opinions and you're not going to change my mind to your way of thinking.
Anyone else feel as I do?