- Posts: 4002
- Joined: Wed Jul 30, 2014 5:25 pm
I work on a number of Indie Film projects for clients. They're a combination of short and feature length forms ranging from 10 to 145 minutes long so far. I always return all the assets and drives to the client but I keep a final DRA of each project. This is because there might be adjustments or the client lost their drives. DRA includes all the files used in the timeline so having those files and being able to restore them is enough. I don't need to waste terabytes of clips that are bad takes, unused, etc.
But even with just DRA which I archived on an external backup drive, over time it gets filled up. 90% of those probably I won't be working on but you never know 36 months down the road. So I started thinking of an archival solution however most of the high-end Sony archiving systems is just too pricey but I get it - why people invest on them. You're paying for insurance.
Recently, I did an analysis of all the DRA files I have to date, especially those with feature length projects. I found that the largest DRA I have is an 80 minutes feature length that was 59Gb. Another 144 minutes feature length was 23Gb. On average, I will say the DRA's are around 40-50Gbs.
So I got to think. What if I used M-Disc to archive each project and just keep them safe? I can put up to 100Gb DRA project on one M-Disc and store it for a very very long time. I can reclaim my drive space and use it for work items. Best part, I can buy a couple of drives and that will set me back only $60. I can by a box of 100Gb M-disc for around $80. That's $140 and although that process of archiving is slow, I can tolerate it. I think that is my cost effective way to do post archiving, besides those disc can last 1000 years.
What are your thoughts on this?
But even with just DRA which I archived on an external backup drive, over time it gets filled up. 90% of those probably I won't be working on but you never know 36 months down the road. So I started thinking of an archival solution however most of the high-end Sony archiving systems is just too pricey but I get it - why people invest on them. You're paying for insurance.
Recently, I did an analysis of all the DRA files I have to date, especially those with feature length projects. I found that the largest DRA I have is an 80 minutes feature length that was 59Gb. Another 144 minutes feature length was 23Gb. On average, I will say the DRA's are around 40-50Gbs.
So I got to think. What if I used M-Disc to archive each project and just keep them safe? I can put up to 100Gb DRA project on one M-Disc and store it for a very very long time. I can reclaim my drive space and use it for work items. Best part, I can buy a couple of drives and that will set me back only $60. I can by a box of 100Gb M-disc for around $80. That's $140 and although that process of archiving is slow, I can tolerate it. I think that is my cost effective way to do post archiving, besides those disc can last 1000 years.
What are your thoughts on this?
URSA Mini Pro 4.6K G2, Blackmagic Design Pocket Cinema Camera 6K, Panasonic GH5
PC Workstation Core I7 64Gb, 2 x AMD R9 390X 8Gb, Blackmagic Design DeckLink 4K Mini Monitor, Windows 10 Pro 64-bit, Resolve Studio 18, BM Micro Panel & Speed Editor
PC Workstation Core I7 64Gb, 2 x AMD R9 390X 8Gb, Blackmagic Design DeckLink 4K Mini Monitor, Windows 10 Pro 64-bit, Resolve Studio 18, BM Micro Panel & Speed Editor