- Posts: 3362
- Joined: Thu Aug 01, 2013 3:58 am
- Location: Earth
Denny Smith wrote:I do not need to “prove” it, as BM stated this when the Micro Camera was released, read back though the previous discussions, you wil, find it.
Also, you can work this out, the Micro Cinema camera has a faster sensor readout time, improved moire’, and a slightly different IQ to the original Pocket, all of which, along with the faster frame rates, indicate a different video processor and/or sensor controller is being used, along with the addition of a fan inside the camera. I wouldn’t be surprised if the Micro Cinema and Micro Studio 4K share some of the same circuits inside, also.
Cheers
Denny, I was going post, do you have any proof of the things you say? Lee should want to prove wherever it is right. But my compromised wide 50p mode should accommodates a lot less data rate and heat than a fullframe 60p mode. So, it would have higher possibility of being possible. Even if you end up with some ML like odd resolution windowed. Will 1800 or 1600 wide-screen work? People upscale arri footage and other around here seem 'happy' with that.
In your 'theory' it light not be possible, but where's the proof. So, let Lee prove it?
But I must say, apart from caution, I agree that Lee should look at pervious work and discussion to learn more!
I have not read anything myself that proves it can't, just hyperbola conjecture, which skeptics seem to roll out. Instead of it not only 'might be impossible', it sensationally CAN'T be possible according to them.
People have to learn the psychological game, skeptics are often supporting their side trying to crush 'dissent'. Their 'wisdom' comes crashing to the ground when wrong.
Unfortunately they hold back human development historically, as they oppose what is eventually proved true (maybe long after people are dead or good or gone) just to boost ego and significance from being the one that objects. They have held back maybe 99% of human development.
The question in a great engineer's mind is "How can it be done reasonably?" Rather than "It can't be done", or how it can't he done (useful information to validate and work around or through). But it takes a lot more work to do the former, and weak engineers do the latter. I have been watching this series on netflix a few days ago, called Seven Wonders of the Industrialised World. It was amazing how many of these engineers, who did what nobody else had ever done before, thought like this. But why the guys with the Panama canal never figured out to use the water to gorge out a significant portion of the channel and take the dirt away (I know that the wash down stream causes issues, but it is more realistic, and you prepare, plan for and accommodate the wash problems. It is probably the usual thing, that it costs more upfront and the alternative looks simplistically better but is actually more over time). I see this stuff everywhere, ralxking up great amounts.
So, are there links to how it's impossible which can be posted? Csaba, as far as I can tell, didn't post one link which showed anything couldn't work?
If you are going come the negative in this type of situation, it is up to you to prove something.
aIf you are not truthfully progressive, maybe you shouldn't say anything
bTruthful side topics in-line with or related to, the discussion accepted
cOften people deceive themselves so much they do not understand, even when the truth is explained to them
bTruthful side topics in-line with or related to, the discussion accepted
cOften people deceive themselves so much they do not understand, even when the truth is explained to them