
- Posts: 9
- Joined: Tue Jan 28, 2025 8:48 pm
- Real Name: Kaya Saman
Hi,
I recently had a chance to make some videos of a recent trip up to Scotland. It was the first time ever doing this and I had a blast though there is still a lot to learn....
I'm coming over from stills photography where I have 2 DSLR camera systems: a Pentax K1 mkII and a Nikon D500.
I use them for landscape, wildlife, macro, and astro (wide angle milkyway stuff but also deep space objects like galaxies and nebula etc).
Before the trip up to Scotland I bought a DJI Action 4, Pocket 3 and Air 3 drone and used them to create these 3 videos while up there
My intention is to create more "overlanding" videos like this and add other elements such as wildlife, macro, interviews, underwater footage (if I go scuba diving), and night sky captures, as well as whatever I encounter along the way.
I had a little look at a sequence on Youtube, which really impressed me. The camera used was a Micro 4k G2 Studio with older Nikon lenses....
As I would like something that can be put together fairly quickly (perhaps even in rig form kept in a vehicle then unloaded and put onto a tripod), I'm not sure if one would consider this "run and gun" type of shooting?
But I was considering the Blackmagic Pocket range of cameras... with my eye quite closely on the 4k version.
Would this be recommended for my use case? I guess the down side to it would be no articulating monitor so I would need to use an extra LCD in situations where you point the camera towards you in order to talk into it, or a vehicle where you are trying to get 2 people in the shot while facing the camera.... additionally I think the AF is just a single point rather then any type of face detection etc... - though to be fair the Pocket 3 will do this; how would using a gimbal work with it I wonder like a DJI one?
I did stumble across an article on the BM website too which showed the Pocket 6k and 4k being used for wildlife...
No idea about lenses either.... I just checked the MFT lenses and the "Pro" lenses from Olympus (OM Systems) seem to have constant aperture and focal lengths up to 500mm (for wildlife) when the 1.25x TC is engaged but how good are they for video is another question?
I did check out Canon and one other manufacturer but their long range telefoto lenses where up at price ranges beyond what I can afford at around $60k (US)
All in all what should I start thinking about?
I mean I could go for a Lumix GH6 VDSLR which seems popular but then I already have 2 dedicated photographic systems and don't need another one....
I would also like to shoot in RAW too for color grading.
Meanwhile I have purchased Davinci Resolve Studio and started playing around with it by reworking my content from Scotland (which was originally done in Shotcut) and I can see a massive improvement in some areas... especially the denoise AI which I didn't have before.
I still need to learn more as the Landrover scene (which was badly underexposed using the Action4) looks quite a bit plasticky after the denoise, even after sharpening - but that's another topic for another time. - just to clarify that this isn't in the video above as that is the original really noisy one done using Shotcut.
Any thoughts would be really appreciated
ps,. not sure if it's because I just signed up but the forum isn't allowing me post URL's even though there is a dedicated URL markup button in the control panel?
I recently had a chance to make some videos of a recent trip up to Scotland. It was the first time ever doing this and I had a blast though there is still a lot to learn....
I'm coming over from stills photography where I have 2 DSLR camera systems: a Pentax K1 mkII and a Nikon D500.
I use them for landscape, wildlife, macro, and astro (wide angle milkyway stuff but also deep space objects like galaxies and nebula etc).
Before the trip up to Scotland I bought a DJI Action 4, Pocket 3 and Air 3 drone and used them to create these 3 videos while up there
My intention is to create more "overlanding" videos like this and add other elements such as wildlife, macro, interviews, underwater footage (if I go scuba diving), and night sky captures, as well as whatever I encounter along the way.
I had a little look at a sequence on Youtube, which really impressed me. The camera used was a Micro 4k G2 Studio with older Nikon lenses....
As I would like something that can be put together fairly quickly (perhaps even in rig form kept in a vehicle then unloaded and put onto a tripod), I'm not sure if one would consider this "run and gun" type of shooting?
But I was considering the Blackmagic Pocket range of cameras... with my eye quite closely on the 4k version.
Would this be recommended for my use case? I guess the down side to it would be no articulating monitor so I would need to use an extra LCD in situations where you point the camera towards you in order to talk into it, or a vehicle where you are trying to get 2 people in the shot while facing the camera.... additionally I think the AF is just a single point rather then any type of face detection etc... - though to be fair the Pocket 3 will do this; how would using a gimbal work with it I wonder like a DJI one?
I did stumble across an article on the BM website too which showed the Pocket 6k and 4k being used for wildlife...
No idea about lenses either.... I just checked the MFT lenses and the "Pro" lenses from Olympus (OM Systems) seem to have constant aperture and focal lengths up to 500mm (for wildlife) when the 1.25x TC is engaged but how good are they for video is another question?
I did check out Canon and one other manufacturer but their long range telefoto lenses where up at price ranges beyond what I can afford at around $60k (US)
All in all what should I start thinking about?
I mean I could go for a Lumix GH6 VDSLR which seems popular but then I already have 2 dedicated photographic systems and don't need another one....
I would also like to shoot in RAW too for color grading.
Meanwhile I have purchased Davinci Resolve Studio and started playing around with it by reworking my content from Scotland (which was originally done in Shotcut) and I can see a massive improvement in some areas... especially the denoise AI which I didn't have before.
I still need to learn more as the Landrover scene (which was badly underexposed using the Action4) looks quite a bit plasticky after the denoise, even after sharpening - but that's another topic for another time. - just to clarify that this isn't in the video above as that is the original really noisy one done using Shotcut.
Any thoughts would be really appreciated

ps,. not sure if it's because I just signed up but the forum isn't allowing me post URL's even though there is a dedicated URL markup button in the control panel?