rick.lang wrote:Rakesh, fortunately by the time people are shooting with the 4.6K sensor, Resolve 12 will be out with its easier management of raw. So quickly the images will look better in post.
While I completely agree with the value of being able to shoot in raw, I'm still quite certain that for most jobs, ProRes HQ in HD will be more than enough. I want raw for the the times when we want the absolute best, and have the time to deal with the extra data capacity in post. I still expect that most of my work will end up being in HD for quite a while, because most of the work in film isn't features. It's corporate communications, ads, etc... most of them intended for web-based delivery, where 4K doesn't add much value.
What's important however is that we'll have the raw option when we need it, but we won't be stuck with it when it's overkill.
And we're getting it for a bit less than the cost of an Alexa Mini, and not much more bulk and weight. (The Alexa Mini is actually quite cute, and not much bigger than an Epic body). Plus the Alexa mini doesn't include a screen. And it also uses CFast2. And has a 3.2K sensor.
We're getting our cake, we get to eat it, and we're getting a bargain. We're getting Alexa-like image quality that will annoy a LOT of Red dongles... I mean, Red "users" for FIVE THOUSAND DOLLARS.
Starting price for a Scarlet? $23k if you want it to be able to record something. So, that's the cost of an Ursa Mini + some CFast2 cards + 3 Zeiss Compact Primes and some bux left over.
And yet people are complaining.