
- Posts: 14
- Joined: Tue Oct 09, 2018 8:17 pm
- Real Name: stan miskiewciz
I shot my first intervew with the my new PC4K along with my GH5 as the second camera on the second shooter.
Very excited until I looked at the footage......
The BM was @ 800 iso, and the video came out super grainy?
everything looked great in the viewfinder but the actual footage seemed underexposed making it gainy??
1 led, 1 white fill card, 1 backlight led. pretty standard stuff.
The GH5 was way footage better.
I could not believe it, I had to hammer the BM footage hard with NEAT just to use it, then I even had to
color it to b&w on top of that for the playing video.
This is the second time shooting with it and both times have been gut-wrenching disappointing in image quality.
Even the color was really bad compared to the GH5, I was able to color match the cloths and skin tone of the person in a minute with Davinci, the BM was a headache and on top of it I could not get the shirt to color match and keep the skin tones. Easy with the GH5 footage.
Both shot log.
BM had a speedbooster ulta .71
sigma 18/35
all the standard stuff.......
Both had similar ISO fstops and shutter.
What am I doing wrong here?
I really want this to work out, I want to love the BM but I am obviously doing something wrong....
I am going to do some more tests but I am halfway to selling it and going with a second gh5. I cant believe I am even thinking that I was just about to go get a second bm and replace the gh5 but now I just dont know.
Very excited until I looked at the footage......
The BM was @ 800 iso, and the video came out super grainy?
everything looked great in the viewfinder but the actual footage seemed underexposed making it gainy??
1 led, 1 white fill card, 1 backlight led. pretty standard stuff.
The GH5 was way footage better.
I could not believe it, I had to hammer the BM footage hard with NEAT just to use it, then I even had to
color it to b&w on top of that for the playing video.
This is the second time shooting with it and both times have been gut-wrenching disappointing in image quality.
Even the color was really bad compared to the GH5, I was able to color match the cloths and skin tone of the person in a minute with Davinci, the BM was a headache and on top of it I could not get the shirt to color match and keep the skin tones. Easy with the GH5 footage.
Both shot log.
BM had a speedbooster ulta .71
sigma 18/35
all the standard stuff.......
Both had similar ISO fstops and shutter.
What am I doing wrong here?
I really want this to work out, I want to love the BM but I am obviously doing something wrong....
I am going to do some more tests but I am halfway to selling it and going with a second gh5. I cant believe I am even thinking that I was just about to go get a second bm and replace the gh5 but now I just dont know.