aaronvandomelen wrote:You're correct. But the main advantage of jumping into fusion is that you can build tools that allow for dynamically adjusting their timing based on the clip length. For some applications this is a major time saver.
You don't need to use fusion for that, copy and paste attributes in edit page will allow you to adjust key frames dynamically to clip lenght (stretch to fit) or maintain timing of the original. That is what I was referring to. You can do it in fusion of course, but it possible and in some situations easier to simply do it with a copy and pate attributes command. Maybe you missed that feature.
aaronvandomelen wrote:I think there is a serious opportunity to give Dynamic Link a few more options, like easing, and specific starting and ending locations. the FlexZoom tool does exactly this, but I feel it would be helpful to just add these settings to the built in tool.
I think dynamic zoom is good in what it does and what is meant to be. Its not like this custom macro Flex Zoom. Its not its purpose. In regards to zooming. Its supremely easy if you use existing features. I've written about it before, but for some reason people miss the method for zooming in the edit page and dynamic starching of key frames. I've built whole video essays made with images as a slideshow in ken burns style, done with ease in edit page. Didn't need to use fusion. Don't get me wrong, I use fusion all the time and love it, but this is one instance, where built in tools are more than enough for vast majority of pan and zoom tasks and they build right into edit page.
viewtopic.php?f=21&t=213335