Eugenia Loli wrote:, as in the Fuji cameras, that ALSO use Sony sensors), but fixes the greens.
Color is matter of taste, I respect the taste
but... Fuji developed their sensors from twenty and more years, from super ccd to actual x-trans sensors, not use Sony tech.
I can tell you that I used every kind of brand and every brand had their look, no one is neutral, canon is unbalanced on magenta on skin tone and not only, Panasonic add pink on white, reduce blu on skin, Sony give me too much green and more... Kodachrome (which some one tell that is emulated from canon, big no no, add magenta on skin tone, yellow often had brown, green over some saturation is green under some saturation go to brown, and more) had a look, every tool had a look (today called color science).
If we had a device no standard to see (monitor, tv, smartphone/tablet display) we can try to neutralise a bit all but everything we do will be see in different way from different people, if you add the fact that most of people enable evil function that add yellow and blu in different hour of day, and all engeneer try to destroy you picture in tv with other evil function on gamma and color...
Every camera had a look, like people in past search a look in a brand of film strip.
Also in the print environment when you print art catalogue you fight with color and never you reproduce real color, most of great printer arrive near, with additional color to classic cmyk, but print is an art that can be linear (if printing process could be constant, also different printing pressure change color), video is so weak in reproduction and not controllable that it’s very difficult, like you discover, to “manage” correctly,
This is the reason behind the existence of work like DiT, colorist, and more in a video/movie production.
Inviato dal mio iPhone utilizzando Tapatalk