BumbleBee wrote:You really better stay with the Premier, it's a professional opinion
Yeah, I know, my workflow is MUCH faster in premiere... problem is just that the colorgrading tools, are 1000x times better than other programs, so I have to do that is Davinci, but when I do it in Davinci, often ALL the effects I have made in premiere pro, are ****** up and I have to make layers and import frames manually. If I could make ALL in Davinci, and it was just as easy, then I would save a LOT of frustration. And that is why I started posting, in hope the team sees and correct small things to make it better![/quote]
My friend what you're looking as bug, in dr is not a bug

it's a different working pipeline...

mp3 or mp2 are missing codecs but it isn't a bug. It's a different corporation view between black magic design and adobe.

for your workflow you have to understand what's better for you... Classic effects between clips (that you can create also in dr), or good and fast color grading? If you thinking about to be faster in premiere, stay in premiere and use lumetri panel to do simple color grading. The perfect program don't exist and that's because you can share timeline in XML with some limitations from and to NLE programs.. In my case, coming after 12 years on media composer, when I switched to premiere, I've worked this years with a keyboard mapped with ALL buttons like media composer. I I was faster like first.

what I mean? I mean that I can understand different functions between program, but I don't understand when people tell that a program it's more faster then another program in daily workflow, because it's a videomaker that make it's workflow not the program
