Better AAF to export to Pro Tools

  • Author
  • Message
Offline

PieroLass

  • Posts: 165
  • Joined: Mon Mar 20, 2017 10:13 pm

audio metadata on export for pro tools

PostThu May 21, 2020 1:21 pm

DaVinci is a great editing software but I still have lots of troubles with aaf export for pro tools. It's getting better but sometimes you have lots of missing clips and I can't get metadata from audio files on my timeline, wich is a real problem if you work with professional audio laboratories that needs to know with mic (lav, boom, name of the character for each lav) is on each track. Each time I try to find a solution to this problem and it's always a nightmare, having to try round trips that never works and finally having to recut in avid to have an aaf with metadata for pro tools.
This is my one and only real need since davinci 14 when I started using this software for editing. Hope this problem will be solved in the next realese.
Offline

Alexandre Westphal

  • Posts: 77
  • Joined: Tue Jul 28, 2015 12:00 pm
  • Location: Paris

Better AAF to export to Pro Tools

PostSun Jul 19, 2020 9:35 am

Hi Resolve team,

Just finished editing a short and a mid lenght film in Resolve, each time the export to Pro Tools for the sound person is a lot of headache.

Can we expect in a near futur a more complete set of options to export an AAF for sound editing in PT ?
Like :
- Export the full audio media used in the timeline and not only used media + handles
- Choosing between "consolidate" or "transcode" option (exporting original files vs transcoded files)
- Export "link to" aaf (with no media)
- Keeping the original media names + metadata to help relinking in Pro tools which seems to be pretty impossible so far.... (and not files named after the track they are on...)

The editing experience is not bad (though there is a big warning for me regarding the responsiveness of the interface, specially for big projects !) but the difficulty to communicate with the main used software for sound editing is a no go for me right now.

Thanks,
Alex
www.embelliefilms.fr
Offline

soundcage

  • Posts: 3
  • Joined: Sun Jan 24, 2021 1:16 pm
  • Real Name: dario radovec

Re: audio metadata on export for pro tools

PostSun Jan 24, 2021 1:51 pm

agree with everything.
and if i may add, we need this things for those of us that use Nuendo.
aaf and metadata are BASIC and ESSENTIAL tools for us to work properly.
if this is not working properly, we cannot work...(properly :) )
this is one small thing that keeps big production companies to make a switch from avid or adove ( i know that becaus i have a contrackt with few of those)
so, a win/win situation for all.
fix this and resolve becomes a good candidate to replace NLEs in broadcast, film,etc...
Offline

postprod-walterfilms

  • Posts: 30
  • Joined: Thu Apr 04, 2019 10:18 am
  • Real Name: Bainier Pierre-Victor

Re: Better AAF to export to Pro Tools

PostThu Jan 28, 2021 12:08 pm

+1

Please keep audio level
Offline

Misha Aranyshev

  • Posts: 116
  • Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 2:13 am

Re: Better AAF to export to Pro Tools

PostTue Feb 09, 2021 6:21 pm

I don't care about pans and levels since most audio editors start from scratch anyways but audio metadata and the ability to export reference AAF just pointing to the original production audio is essential for wider acceptance of Resolve as a viable NLE.
Offline

PieroLass

  • Posts: 165
  • Joined: Mon Mar 20, 2017 10:13 pm

Re: Better AAF to export to Pro Tools

PostFri Feb 12, 2021 12:42 am

Audio metadata and the ability to export reference AAF just pointing to the original production audio is what I'm asking on this forum since Davinci 14, otherwise I'm totally happy with Davinci as a professional editor.
Davinci is a great editing software and it keeps getting better each new release, but on aaf topic there is no real progress, they add all kind of complicated stuff but on this basic need they make very little step from one version to another. Don't know if it's an industry patent problem with aaf. It's true that Final Cut Pro don't export any aaf, Premier pro export aaf that works but without metadata and original audio file reference. So teorically Davinci is willing to give us aaf for pro tools, but in the real world experience sometimes it works sometimes you get a lot of problems of different kind.
In the last apple m1 version aaf was totally broken and the next beta they fixed the aaf problem. Hope they make another effort to make aaf export for pro tools an easy experience that fullfill the request from audio people that work mostly on pro tools. Otherwise a lot o professional editor will stick to avid since is more reliable for aaf.
Offline

Misha Aranyshev

  • Posts: 116
  • Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 2:13 am

Re: Better AAF to export to Pro Tools

PostFri Feb 12, 2021 4:23 am

As far as I remember Soundtrack Pro could make a decent reference AAF.
Offline

PieroLass

  • Posts: 165
  • Joined: Mon Mar 20, 2017 10:13 pm

Re: Better AAF to export to Pro Tools

PostSun Feb 14, 2021 11:31 pm

Soundtrack Pro is dead, little old now, but right now Final Cut Pro has a software, X2pro that provide a good aaf from an fcpxml. I would love something similar for Davinci, since aaf export for pro tools inside davinci don't provide metadata and the possibility to relink original audio, an external software that make editors and assistant editor work easy. It's difficult to avoid the problems you will have to deal with when you have to move audio to protools to producers, directors and audio editors that come at the end of the editing.
Offline

SandroSchreiber

  • Posts: 141
  • Joined: Wed Dec 12, 2018 7:01 am
  • Real Name: Sandro Schreiber

Re: Better AAF to export to Pro Tools

PostMon Mar 01, 2021 12:30 pm

+1 on everything.

- Ability to link to original media
- Ability to export .wav instead of .mxf
- Ability to render audio effects into the trimmed audio files
- Metadata

Right now I have to do a PR roundtrip for an aaf that is compatible with most destination DAWs.
Resolve Studio 19.1.3 | Resolve Mini Panel/Micro Color Panel | Win11 24H2
GeForce RTX4090 (572.16 studio driver) | DeckLink Mini Monitor 4K, Desktop Video 14.2
Offline

Simon Rabeder

  • Posts: 127
  • Joined: Wed Dec 17, 2014 12:42 am
  • Location: Vienna, Austria

Re: Better AAF to export to Pro Tools

PostMon Mar 01, 2021 12:42 pm

+1

also, I still dislike the fact that the Clips point back to synced audio as stated in the media bin and can't unlink the in the timeline so that they point to the audio file and not the synced clip. I would like to be able to "unnest" them.

Another thing is, sync multiple audio sources into the clip. If you use additional plant mics or several audio recorders (like track e or instamic) this is crucial.
Offline

AnarchyAcres

  • Posts: 26
  • Joined: Tue Apr 28, 2020 5:01 pm
  • Real Name: CHARLES TENNESSEN

Re: Better AAF to export to Pro Tools

PostWed Mar 17, 2021 3:29 pm

Please fix all of the aaf workflow issues as soon as possible! I'm experiencing compatibility problems right now with my protools audio editor, meaning that I'm paying big money for him to debug import/export issues and not to work on my film. I have found many comments around the internet from people who were going to do their project in DR, but went back to their old software after learning about aaf workflow issues with DR. Blackmagic, you are shooting yourself in the foot by not fixing all this ASAP!

PS I can't even export audio aaf and re-import to DR without tracks coming up missing! Something is wrong with DR's aaf workflow and needs to be fixed.
DR 18.6
Windows 10 Pro
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X 12 core
64GB 2X32 D4 3600 RAM
EVGA GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER 8GB GDDR6 460.89 Driver
Offline

michaelcacioppobelantara

  • Posts: 27
  • Joined: Wed Jun 17, 2015 3:24 pm

Re: Better AAF to export to Pro Tools

PostThu Mar 18, 2021 9:50 pm

I have had decent luck with AAF export from the Edit page. The deliver page AAF does not do what I need Pro Tools to do. If you are savvy with relink workflows in Pro Tools the Edit page AAF does what you need.
Offline

PieroLass

  • Posts: 165
  • Joined: Mon Mar 20, 2017 10:13 pm

Re: Better AAF to export to Pro Tools

PostFri Mar 19, 2021 9:22 am

hi,
could you please explain your workflow to export to pro tools? Anyway I find each project could have different problems, so each time you have to find the solution to deliver a pro tools session the way sound guys want.
Lately since I have a new M1 Mac I tried to use X2pro and it seems it works, but I have to do more accurate tests. I read on this forum that also editload might work but I haven't find any information about that and how you can use with Davinci.
Part of the problem is that when you have synchronized clips and the audio became slave to the video file, no way to flatten the clip, so in the aaf audio it's like it's audio from camera, not the original audio file. And audio metadata are lost in aaf export for pro tools.
But if you have find a way to relink easely to original audio file in pro tools could be very useful!!
Thanks!
Offline

PieroLass

  • Posts: 165
  • Joined: Mon Mar 20, 2017 10:13 pm

Re: Better AAF to export to Pro Tools

PostSat Mar 20, 2021 12:00 pm

Anyway in my latest test with m1 Mac and dvr 17.1.10 I found that if the sound is not in a synchronized clip, the export to pro tools create new audio file. but they bring the audio metadata!!!!! You can know what there is in each mic! But in the synchronized clip you loose every audio metadata. Maybe the solution is to have the possibility to flatten synchronized clip like the Multicam clips...
Offline

etang77

  • Posts: 125
  • Joined: Mon Aug 27, 2018 8:51 am
  • Real Name: Eric Tang

Re: Better AAF to export to Pro Tools

PostSun Mar 21, 2021 12:47 pm

PieroLass wrote:Anyway in my latest test with m1 Mac and dvr 17.1.10 I found that if the sound is not in a synchronized clip, the export to pro tools create new audio file. but they bring the audio metadata!!!!! You can know what there is in each mic! But in the synchronized clip you loose every audio metadata. Maybe the solution is to have the possibility to flatten synchronized clip like the Multicam clips...


Were they sync on timeline? Or were they sync using sync tool? I haven't got a project on hand to test out with 17. Would that bring a different outcome?

Edited:
I feel to this issue and the non replies, is adding insult to injury. You see lots of requests at least get a no from the moderator. And as PieroLass put it, this issue has been raised since 14, and not once have we seen any sort of reply, not no, not we're working on it, not we couldn't get it to work, nothing!!!
Offline

PieroLass

  • Posts: 165
  • Joined: Mon Mar 20, 2017 10:13 pm

Re: Better AAF to export to Pro Tools

PostFri Mar 26, 2021 10:16 am

If you want to preserve audio metadata you can't sinch clips because audio became like audio camera. You have to sync on timeline, manually or with auto allign clips option in timeline, that anyway doesn't work with a bunch of clips you have to organize first audio and video on the timeline. Anyway strangely even audio clips not synched on the timeline in the aaf or the xml takes the name of the track where they are on the time line, not just the name of the file!
I think there is a problem with aaf for pro tools for Black magic. Might be a problem of patents or I don't know what else, that is the reason why they are so shy about it. Davinci keep becoming better with incredible new features each new release but the only feature I need, a very basic one, like the possibility to send audio to pro tools, witch right now it is still the most common daw in audio professional field, is not working properly yet (reliability, audio metadata and possibility to relink original audio files in pro tools still missing). I hope this is not to make people use Fairlight because it doesn't work that way. Even if I love edit in davinci I have to move to avid when I can't have problems at the end of the editing, if I know the audio facility have professional request that I know I can't fulfill with the davinci aaf problem. If you edit weddings or blogger stuff or you work on your own aaf for pro tools it's not a problem. But each tv show, documentary or movie end in pro tools right now for audio editing and mix, like they end in davinci for color correction.
I would love to see surface a software that assure to give the pro tools aaf they professional need, something like x2pro or edit load but dedicated to davinci, or the solution of the problem inside Davinci, once for all. I still have hope!
Offline

Misha Aranyshev

  • Posts: 116
  • Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 2:13 am

Re: Better AAF to export to Pro Tools

PostFri Mar 26, 2021 4:55 pm

How about re-conforming the timeline to the production audio before exporting the AAF? There is matching timecode and clip names so it might work.
Offline

PieroLass

  • Posts: 165
  • Joined: Mon Mar 20, 2017 10:13 pm

Re: Better AAF to export to Pro Tools

PostMon Mar 29, 2021 2:23 pm

It's extremely difficult conforming the timeline with the original audio files when you have edited synchronized clips, try and you will see, it's possibile but non easy and with a 90 minutes feature it's extremely painful and you can get lot of errors along the way. But if black magic add the possibility to flatten a synchronized clip like you can do with Multicam clips this could be super easy to do and without errors...
Offline

Misha Aranyshev

  • Posts: 116
  • Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 2:13 am

Re: Better AAF to export to Pro Tools

PostMon Mar 29, 2021 9:07 pm

PieroLass wrote:It's extremely difficult conforming the timeline with the original audio files when you have edited synchronized clips, try and you will see, it's possibile but non easy and with a 90 minutes feature it's extremely painful and you can get lot of errors along the way. But if black magic add the possibility to flatten a synchronized clip like you can do with Multicam clips this could be super easy to do and without errors...


Yes, "Decompose in place" for synced clips would do the trick.

Since this is a very important feature for a very niche part of the market what we should do is to write a short and concise description of what we need and sign it with our full credentials: name, company, title, IMDb link and send it to Grant. That's how we got 24@25 fps timecode support in FCP back in the day. The problem is how to reach all the editors who really need this feature but not aware of our discussion here.
Offline

michaelcacioppobelantara

  • Posts: 27
  • Joined: Wed Jun 17, 2015 3:24 pm

Re: Better AAF to export to Pro Tools

PostWed Mar 31, 2021 1:27 pm

PieroLass wrote:hi,
could you please explain your workflow to export to pro tools? Anyway I find each project could have different problems, so each time you have to find the solution to deliver a pro tools session the way sound guys want.
Lately since I have a new M1 Mac I tried to use X2pro and it seems it works, but I have to do more accurate tests. I read on this forum that also editload might work but I haven't find any information about that and how you can use with Davinci.
Part of the problem is that when you have synchronized clips and the audio became slave to the video file, no way to flatten the clip, so in the aaf audio it's like it's audio from camera, not the original audio file. And audio metadata are lost in aaf export for pro tools.
But if you have find a way to relink easely to original audio file in pro tools could be very useful!!
Thanks!



Hi Piero,

Sorry I had notifications off and did not check this thread again for sometime. I will try to get my workflow described when I have a free moment but these are busy days....
Offline
User avatar

GregAusina

  • Posts: 194
  • Joined: Thu Aug 23, 2012 7:30 pm
  • Location: Paris - France

Re: Better AAF to export to Pro Tools

PostFri Jul 16, 2021 9:41 am

Misha Aranyshev wrote:
Yes, "Decompose in place" for synced clips would do the trick.



Exactly what I'm after. I'm trying to send a dra project to a sound studio and I'm trying to make it light. The problem here is if audio was synced with image there is no way to unlink it without loosing the edit.
Decompose in place or flatten audio sync is an absolute needed feature! The is no work around.
Grégoire AUSINA / Gisèle productions
Davinci 19 on Windows 10 / latest Nvidia studio driver / Dual Xeon E-2650v4 / supermicro X10DRG-Q / 128 Go RAM / GUI GTX 1070 / Cuda GTX 3090 - FSI CM250 - Tangent Elements - Accusys A12S3-p+
Offline
User avatar

jonahlee

  • Posts: 6
  • Joined: Mon May 13, 2019 8:21 pm
  • Location: Los Angeles, CA
  • Real Name: Jonah Walker

Re: Better AAF to export to Pro Tools

PostTue Jul 20, 2021 12:46 pm

Yea trying the export to ProTools and the mixer is missing all the synced audio, and music. Got a few sound fx only. Am going to try sending to Premiere and exporting aaf from there.
-Jonah Lee Walker

Video Editor, Colorist and Motion Graphics Artist
http://www.whaleofatale.net http://www.jonahlee.com

iMacPro 3 GHz
64 GB 2666 MHz DDR4
Radeon Pro Vega 64x 16 GB
Offline

rubefink

  • Posts: 65
  • Joined: Mon Nov 25, 2019 8:33 pm
  • Real Name: Reuben Finkelstein

Re: Better AAF to export to Pro Tools

PostFri Jul 23, 2021 10:23 am

I do believe AAF export has been fixed in 17.2.2. At least in my testing I’ve had success and all iXML DATA is intact. Note that I did not used embedded as an option. Linear PCM is the only thing that works. And another gotcha is if it’s an older project that was updated to this newer version then it will not work. It has something to do with how davinci sees the footage on import. Fresh projects have been successful in my tests.
Offline

Simon Rabeder

  • Posts: 127
  • Joined: Wed Dec 17, 2014 12:42 am
  • Location: Vienna, Austria

Re: Better AAF to export to Pro Tools

PostTue Dec 14, 2021 6:07 pm

Oh darn it, I wanted to just export a non-embedded AAF and it is still not working! All the Music and FX are there but the synced audio is not. It can't be so hard to implement.
Offline

rubefink

  • Posts: 65
  • Joined: Mon Nov 25, 2019 8:33 pm
  • Real Name: Reuben Finkelstein

Re: Better AAF to export to Pro Tools

PostFri Dec 17, 2021 3:35 am

Simon Rabeder wrote:Oh darn it, I wanted to just export a non-embedded AAF and it is still not working! All the Music and FX are there but the synced audio is not. It can't be so hard to implement.


I've run multiple AAF exports and have retained the synced audio.
What are your settings?
Offline

aaronvandomelen

  • Posts: 170
  • Joined: Sun Mar 01, 2020 3:11 am
  • Real Name: Aaron Van Domelen

Re: Better AAF to export to Pro Tools

PostSat Dec 28, 2024 12:27 pm

Reactivating this request thread for a few reasons.


    First, I want to explain that yes the Pro Tools Export Preset has a handful of advantages and is a critical tool, it's just time to give it more power. Right now the Pro Tools Preset can do a few things the basic AAF export can not do. It can reach detect any linked audio and pass them along the Pro Tools AAF. The direct AAF export can not do this, and erroneously links to the video file only (making hand offs to Pro Tools impossible). The Pro Tools export preset works much better in this regard.

    Second, the Pro Tools export preset allows for sample level accuracy when exporting. Direct AAF export does not allow this. In fact, most timeline export formats do not support sample level editing points. So for sending direct to Pro Tools this is one of the few ways to pass along your edits accurately. Also, passing sample accurate edits to Pro Tools is less prone to errors. As in previous versions this would cause AAF export errors and sync errors. Using any tools like Premiere or Avid as an intermediary will rip out these sample accurate edit points, so I don't like this method if I can avoid it.

    Third, it passes along all embedded file metadata through the wav file export mode. The AAF does this in a sense, since it's linking to the source audio directly, but only for audio files not linked to video files in the media pool, since those don't pass along at all with direct AAF export.

    Fourth, Track Names, Fades & Automation are converted and passed along. It's translated or a direct 1 to 1 transfers, but it's there too, great! Even if they wipe this work away, it's a very valuable guide.

So here is my Request List of ways we need to beef up this hand over if pros in post sound will ever give Resolve a real shot (honestly, this might be a bigger hurdle for Media Composer editors than any other roadblock, so listen up please.

So some context first. In general, post audio teams expect to be able to source back to their original location or production audio for editing and mixing on set recorded audio. It's critical for AAF's to include not only accurate timecode, but clip metadata to link be able to conform and assemble back to the original media. See Ediload's workflow here too and why assembling polywavs in mono tracks for protools is so useful:


Also review Mike's articles about this subject here on why Conforming is so valuable for Post Audio here :https://www.production-expert.com/home-page/2016/7/1/pro-tools-conforming-and-re-conforming-in-audio-post-production-part-1 and here: https://www.production-expert.com/home-page/2016/7/1/pro-tools-conforming-and-re-conforming-in-audio-post-production-part-3.

Mike's article on using Resolve to send to Pro Tools as well, confirms the above workflow. See here:
https://www.production-expert.com/produ ... ci-resolve
So based on the above, for the Pro Tools preset to really gain the capability it needs to actually be useful to pros sending to mixers in Pro Tools it needs a version 3.0 (please).


    1. *Critical* Give the preset the ability to not only pass metadata through the exported wav file, but also saved in the AAF metadata as well.

      If it needs to use the original waveform files as that metadata source, so be it, but either way, send the Reel Name, Scene Number, Take Number along with the accurate timecode it's sending now along inside the AAF and not just stored in the wav file.

      If you can add that metadata into the mxf wrapped too, go for it. Passing this metadata along will allow for fast and efficient conforms when using conforming tools like EdiLoad.

      If there are ways to pass along additional metadata from Resolve, that would be amazing too. Sometimes I need to fix metadata, repair, or add more notes in Resolve. Please let me pass that metadata along via the AAF or Waveform file export so I can use EdiLoad to transfer that metadata too.

      (BTW, V19 release notes include a mention of better conforming options with third party tools, but I can't find any explanation about that that means and what third party software Resolve is targeting here, if anyone knows I would love to know too).

    2. *Critical* Add the ability to link directly to the source media upon export instead of rendering out smaller files that trim to the audio in use.

      Handles are nice to have, but often production audio is small enough, even on a feature, to share along with project files.

      Trimming can be helpful on some projects, but narrative film & TV productions have likely already sent along the location audio to the post audio team on a drive anyway. So trimming down just forces them to go the extra step to conform using a third party tool.

      Finally, the current way Resolve exports and create files adds a lot of prefix data to the file name. In theory, if linking to the original clips, all this rendering and renaming could be skipped.


    3. The manual already states that this preset will link any and all channels within the polywav file. But what it doesn't clarify is that it really needs those channels expanded on the working timeline for them to be passed along to Pro Tools.

      I want Resolve to be smart enough to create sub tracks, like Ediload, and assemble all the individual poly wav files into a track of additional tracks.

      Create extra tracks when polywav files are being linked and provide an option to create extra tracks for each additional channel that is available. Again, review EdiLoad's Assembly workflow here. Personally, I would just rather use Ediload for this anyway, since I can cleanup the tracks better anyway, but overall, adding more functions like this for turn around would be nice to have regardless.

      But a basic version of this method would very helpful for those who can spring for another tool. Look at what X2Pro5 also does for FCPX too. It's a great example of how you can make a Pro Tools compatible AAF that links to original media well and accurately.

    4. Support Marker Exporting too. Right now you have to convert timeline markers into markers Pro Tools can read using editingtools.io. Let's cut out the extra step if we can please.

    5. Add options to transfer Layered Audio Editing to Pro Tools.
      Right now layered audio editing only transfers the lowest audio file that is linked. While the top level is what is active in Resolve. Instead have an option to flatten these before exporting to the Pro Tools setting.

      The goal here is to maintain the layered audio editing function in Resolve for continued editing after sending to post. As right now I have to use the Flatten Audio Layers function before sending to Pro Tools and audio the work.

      If it's possible to flatten just during the export, I can continue to use layered audio editing as I keep working incase picture lock isn't real.

      If it's also possible to convert audio track layers into discrete tracks in the Pro Tools project export, that would be even more powerful. It would mean disabling items within the layered tracks, but it could be very helpful. But I understand that might be a tall order.


Overall, there is a lot of room to improve this export tool, but I think, overall, it's still the best way to send to Pro Tools. This tool is sample accurate and allows to deep linking to original audio. If we just added the ability to bounce metadata and link to the original media instead of rendering new files that could be a massive help. The other requests are a lot lower need in my opinion.

Thanks!
current config = Apple M1 Pro 16GB RAM, Mac OSX 13.6.2

Return to DaVinci Resolve Feature Requests

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 21 guests